Shakespeare and the Emblem Writers: an exposition of their similarities of throught and expression, preceded by a view of emblem-literature down to A.D. 1616Green, Henry
History
Shakespeare and the Emblem Writers: an exposition of their similarities of throught and expression, preceded by a view of emblem-literature down to A.D. 1616
Green, Henry
Emblem books, English -- History; Emblems -- England -- History; Emblems in literature; Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Sources
When we maintain that Shakespeare not unfrequently made use of the
Emblem writers, we do not mean to imply that he was generally a direct
copyist from them. This is seldom the case. But a word, a phrase, or an
allusion, sufficiently demonstrates whence particular thoughts have been
derived, and how they have been coloured and clothed. They have been
gathered as flowers in a country-walk are gathered—one from this
hedge-side, another from that, and a third from among the standing corn,
and others from the margin of some murmuring stream; but all have their
natural beauty heightened by the skill with which they are blended so as
to impart gracefulness to the whole. Flora’s gems they may be, but the
enwoven coronal borrows its chief charm from the artistic power and
fitness with which its parts are arranged: break the thread, or cut the
string with which Genius has bound them together, and they fall into
inextricable confusion—a mass of disorder—no longer a pride and a joy:
but let them remain, as a most excellent skill has placed them, and for
ever could we gaze on their loveliness. A matchless beauty has been
achieved, and all the more do we value it, because upon it there is also
stamped eternal youth.
[Illustration: _Symbola, 1679._]
-----
Footnote 64:
We select an instance common to both Holbein and Shakespeare; it is
pointed out by Woltmann, in his _Holbein and his Time_, vol. ii. p.
23, where, speaking of the Holbein painting, _The Death of Lucretia_,
the writer says,—“The costume is here, as ever, that of Holbein’s own
time. The painter reminds us of Shakespeare, who also conceived the
heroes of classic antiquity in the costume of his own days; in the
_Julius Cæsar_ the troops are drawn up by beat of drum, and Coriolanus
comes forth like an English lord: but the historical signification of
the subject nevertheless does in a degree become understood, which the
later poetry, with every instrument of archæological learning,
troubles itself in vain to reach.”
It may be noted that in other instances both Wornum, the English
biographer of Holbein, and Woltmann, the German, compare Holbein and
Shakespeare, or, rather, illustrate the one by the other.
Footnote 65:
As when Cooper, at the tomb of Shakespeare, describes it,—
“The scene then chang’d from this romantic land,
To a bleak waste by bound’ry unconfin’d,
Where three swart sisters of the weird band
Were mutt’ring curses to the troublous wind.”
Footnote 66:
Act v. sc. 3, lines 14–84, Cambridge edition, vol iii. pp. 422–25.
Footnote 67:
The ivory statue changed into a woman, which Ovid describes,
_Metamorphoses_, bk. x. fab. viii. 12–16, is a description of kindred
excellence to that of Shakespeare:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account