Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
History
Shipbuilding from its beginnings. Vol. 1 (of 3)
Konijnenburg, E. van (Emile)
Shipbuilding -- History; Ships -- History
The results of this expedition, while not brilliant, had, nevertheless,
as a consequence, the formation, in 1602, of the East India Company
which played such an important part in our history.
It is useless to add that these events had a decisive influence on the
development of our naval architecture.
Up to the beginning of the XVIIth century, there was as yet no question
of a war fleet properly so-called. Merchant ships were still hired and
converted into men-of-war to meet contingencies. Our fleet was made up
at that time of all kinds of types of vessels. Among them the square
sterned vessels, called pinnaces, the “Vliebooten” or flyboats and the
flutes were the most important. There were also some “Hekkebooten” and
small “smaks”. So the three kinds of vessels already mentioned above
are again found: viz: the square-stern ships, the flyboats and the
smacks.
[Sidenote: II 149]
The old Zierikzee model gives an exact idea of the transition
from the square-stern ship of the XVIth century to the one of the
XVIIth. Although erring, like all the old reproductions, in regard
to proportions, this model cannot fail to attract our attention to
the marked slope of the stem. It was generally admitted at this time
that the ship should draw the least water possible and have the stem
strongly sloping, with an overhanging bow, so as to displace the water
more easily or, as it was then said, to carry the water underneath and
not around the hull. It was believed that the water was drawn under the
sides (~Van Yk~, p. 353) and that the strongly raking stem allowed the
boat to slide more easily over the water. (~Witsen~, p. 47, column 2
_in fine_.)
Later, opinion changed and then it was seen that the stem was brought
more and more nearly upright until the XIXth century; the vessel thus
gains in fullness.
Fürtenbach reproduces for us a Dutch vessel of the beginning of the
XVIIth century; the counter, probably to avoid difficulties of drawing,
is only sketched in by a few lines. It is seen that the after castle
has increased in proportions, and that the part which separates the
forward and after castles still remains uncovered. This kind of
construction, due to the progressive development of the castles of the
Middle Ages, only disappears at the end of the XVIIIth century, when
vessels with two and three decks come on the scene.
The forward and after castles, in these last ships, are of the same
height; in a word, they are strongly connected to each other and are
formed of several superposed decks.
The rigging, too, has undergone new changes, by reason, no doubt, of
the raising of the stern. The fourth small mast put up at this point
gives way, especially, to a mast carrying a square sail and fixed at
the end of the bowsprit. This mast was used only for steering the ship.
The vessels gained in size and the armament was improved by a more
rational distribution of the guns. The following figures give the proof
of this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account