It is not, however, within the province of this book to discuss wars
and battles on the sea. The person interested in that important subject
should read Admiral A. T. Mahan’s “The Influence of Sea Power upon
History” in order to gain a clear picture of the great phases of that
subject. But all of this is outside the range of this book, which deals
only with the types of ships and their development.
The first warships of which history gives any account were those of
the Egyptians. They differed little from the other ships of the time
except in having affixed to their bows a metal ram. This, however, was
well above water. When these ships were in action the sail was rolled
up and made fast by loops of line to the upper yard. They were driven
by large paddles, and were steered, as well, by paddles, many being
required. Egyptologists tell us that the Egyptians, between 3000 and
1000 B. C., fought occasional naval battles with people as far distant
as those of Sicily, for Egypt seemed to have a fascination for all the
Mediterranean peoples even of this early day, and occasional forays
were made against the Egyptian coast.
[Illustration: AN ENGLISH WARSHIP OF THE TIME OF HENRY V
_By the time this ship was built hulls had grown considerably in size
over what they had been at the time of William the Conqueror, and the
era of lavish decoration was well under way. The numerous decks of
this ship were not unusual for the time._
]
The Phœnicians came next as a sea-going people, and it was they who
so greatly developed ships. So little, however, is known of Phœnician
ships that it is necessary, in this hurried account, to pass them by in
order to take up the Greek ships of which many records are still extant.
In Chapter I, I have mentioned the galleys, but there are many things
concerning them upon which it is interesting to enlarge.
These ancient war vessels are divided into two major types—“aphract,”
or those which had no protection for the topmost tier of rowers,
and “cataphract,” or those that had a raised bulwark which shielded
them from the sight and arrows of the enemy. These two words mean,
literally, “unfenced” and “fenced.” In other words, the cataphract
ships had a “fence” built up above their sides to shield the oarsmen,
while on the aphract ships this “fence” was not installed. Both these
types had upper and lower decks, although the cataphract type was
higher than the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account