Siam and Laos, as Seen by Our American Missionaries
History
Siam and Laos, as Seen by Our American Missionaries
Laos -- Description and travel; Missions -- Laos; Missions -- Thailand; Thailand -- Description and travel
With the last week of the year 1849 the Rev. Asa Hemenway, the sole
remaining missionary of the A. B. C. F. M., after just ten years of
faithful service on mission-ground, embarked with his family for the
United States, and the operations of that Board in Siam closed. For
fifteen years its missionaries had cultivated this interesting and
inviting, but as to visible results most barren, field. From none of
the native races of the land had they gathered one reliable convert.
Their missionaries had labored, and labored well, but others were to
enter into their labor. The “set time” for Siam’s visitation had not
yet come. It would seem that “he that letteth must let, till he be
taken out of the way” of this man-fearing people before gospel truth
could have “free course, run and be glorified.” The books that they
prepared, translated and distributed, the favor won by their
gratuitous healing of the sick, and the introduction, first, of
inoculation and afterward of vaccination for the small-pox, the
training given in habits of industry and order and in knowledge of the
Christian Scriptures to those employed by them in their printing-office
and in their families, were not lost, nor the high opinion the natives
learned to entertain of the truthfulness, benevolence and goodness of
American Christian men derived from them and their worthy Baptist
associates. And we must not forget how largely the career of progress
on which Siam has since entered is traceable to the influence of one
member of this mission.
In the spring of 1850 the Rev. Dr. Bradley, who had, while in the
United States, transferred his relations to the American Missionary
Association, returned with Mrs. Sarah B. Bradley and his children, and
with him came as associates the Rev. L. B. Lane, M. D., and Prof. J.
Silsby. To the A. M. A. had been made over the dwelling-houses,
chapel, printing-press, etc. of the A. B. C. F. M.; the ground on
which they stood had been only leased.
It was now imperatively necessary that the Presbyterian mission should
have a home of its own, but all attempts to procure one failed. The
knowledge of the unwillingness of the government to give foreigners
any foothold upon the soil deterred the owners of suitable locations
from selling to the missionaries. And when at last one, braver than
the rest, was found willing to part with land enough for a station in
the upper part of the city, and permission to purchase obtained from
the proper official, and the money had been paid over, and one of the
missionaries with his family had removed in a floating house to the
spot to commence building, a peremptory order from one of the highest
grandees revoked the permission given, and compelled the return of the
mission family and the payment back of the purchase-money by the
seller. No other reason was given than that “the residence of
foreigners there was contrary to the custom of the country.” Nor could
any eligible site be rented even.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account