Siam and Laos, as Seen by Our American Missionaries
History
Siam and Laos, as Seen by Our American Missionaries
Laos -- Description and travel; Missions -- Laos; Missions -- Thailand; Thailand -- Description and travel
On the 31st of March, 1869, there was received at the U. S. consulate
a communication of which the following is a literal translation: “Chow
Phya Pooterapai, Minister of the Interior, begs to inform the acting
consul of the United States of America that Pra Chow Kawilorot, the
king of Cheung Mai, has sent down letters to Prince Hluang Hluang and
the Prime Minister and myself, the purport of all being the same――viz.
that whereas in former times the principalities of Cheung Mai and
Lampang and Lampoon had never been subject to visitation of famine,
now for two years――the year of the Tiger [1866-67] and the year of the
Rabbit [1867-68]――there has been a scarcity of rice. It is evident
that what has befallen the country is because in these lands, where no
foreigner ever before had come to live permanently, now at this time
the missionary McGilvary, who has come as a teacher of religion, had
taken up his residence in Cheung Mai. Hence these calamities have come
upon them. He, the king of Cheung Mai, begs that the consul be made to
issue an order withdrawing [lit. “pulling up”] the missionary
McGilvary and requiring his return. What is proper to be done in this
matter? You are requested to take the subject into consideration.”
To this letter Mr. McDonald, who, singularly enough, happened to be
acting U. S. consul at that time, under date of April 1st replied
substantially as follows: “He has received the communication of His
Excellency the Minister of Foreign Affairs forwarding the complaint of
the king of Cheung Mai, alleging Mr. McGilvary to be the cause of the
famine in his dominions and requesting his removal. In reply he begs
to say that it strikes him as rather singular to attribute the famine
during the year of the Tiger [1866-67] to Mr. McG.’s taking up his
residence in Cheung Mai, inasmuch as the scant harvest of that year
had already been reaped before Mr. McG. had arrived, or even left
Bangkok to go up to Cheung Mai, for it was not till Jan. 3, 1867, that
he set out on his journey. And this year [1868-69], though Mr. McG. is
still at Cheung Mai, we have tidings of an abundant harvest there.
Moreover, in 1865-66, Korat and other towns in that quarter
experienced a severe famine, and yet no foreigner had ever resided in
that region of country. Orders will be given to Mr. McGilvary so to
deport himself that no famine can be attributed to him hereafter; but
as to his (the consul’s) being required to withdraw Mr. McG. and
constrain him to return, it would be manifestly wrong. His Excellency
(the Minister of the Interior) and the Siamese government gave consent
to Mr. McG.’s going up to Cheung Mai, and he went on the invitation of
the king of Cheung Mai himself also. Moreover, he has expended on the
removal of his family and goods no small amount of money. That he (the
consul) should be asked to recall Mr. McG., and constrain him to
return, without any transgression of the laws alleged against him――in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account