Siberia (Russia); Siberia (Russia) -- Description and travel
While we were thus pausing and surveying the wreckage, human and
material, various Cossack chiefs, schooled in the methods of the old
régime, seized power and began building up principalities of their
own--Kalmikoff as governor-general of the Ussuri district, and Semenoff
as boss of the Trans-Baikal.
They used the old tricks of autocracy--swords and ceremony--which the
people feared and by which they were impressed with demonstrations of
physical power. Then to catch the imagination of the nations which
wished to see Russia rehabilitate herself speedily, they began to
talk in a patter, the key-note of which was, and is: “I stand for a
free and reunited Russia, a Russia greater than the old.” Whereupon
they proceeded to deny anything in the nature of freedom, and to
disunite Russia. All they stood for, and still stand for, is their
own glorification and reward and the gambler’s chance that they
will inherit the throne of the Czars. If they cannot attain to such
ambitions, at least they hope to sell out their usurped powers in
case some figure of imperial lineage comes out of hiding to take the
shattered crown.
We kept assuring the Siberians that our government stood as their
friend, at the same time neither denouncing, nor interfering with these
usurpers. The people, for all their abysmal ignorance, knew perfectly
well what was going on--they recognized autocracy because they had
to submit to it. And, speaking generally, the attitude of the United
States was: “Why cannot you people get together and settle up this
mess--all you have to do is come to an agreement, and reunite Russia!”
This while several civil wars were being fought in the country!
At home our press and public were making a hue and cry against
Bolshevism. Yet in Siberia were Cossack chiefs with little armies
opposed to the Bolshevists, but inactive because they were not sure
what we might do. Our failure to throw in with these chiefs, led the
Bolshevist leaders to hope, if not actually believe, that we favored
Bolshevism, or at least did not dare fight it. At any rate, our “do
nothing” policy allowed the Bolshevist leaders, crafty in intrigue,
propaganda and organization, to whisper to their wavering adherents
that the United States was passively favoring them and that recognition
of the Bolshevist government was only a matter of time.
In effect, our operations for nearly a year, were a subsidy to
Bolshevism. Our civilian-aid agencies were unwitting helpers to the
secret Bolshevists of Siberia, for they gave comfort and encouragement
to the idea that Bolshevism in Siberia was a success. We repaired a
lot of damage that Bolshevism had done, before the people of Siberia
could realize what the destruction meant--before they could learn for
themselves what a mess they had made of things.
Our government did relief work, and became actually thereby an
ally of the Bolshevist régime, though maintaining an attitude of
non-interference--neutrality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account