Several other noteworthy advances have been made as an outgrowth of the Mercury animal flights. Immediately before the orbital flight MA-5, in which the chimpanzee Enos was employed, it was unexpectedly found that this 5-year-old animal was hypertensive. Subsequent centrifuge studies showed that its vascular responses exceeded those of a control group. Consideration of the animal’s preflight experience led to speculation concerning the origin of this hypertension. An explanation of the high-blood-pressure responses detected in Enos has been pursued by Meehan et al. ([ref.87]). Persistent hypertension has been produced in other laboratory chimpanzees restrained in the same manner as those participating in space flight and exposed to demanding performance tasks, a demonstration which has important implications for prolonged manned space flight and for cardiovascular medicine in general. Studies more directly concerned with behavior and performance have been extended from those of Project Mercury. These extensions have been in the following directions: (1) the establishment and maintenance of complex behavioral repertoires under conditions of full environmental control, (2) the refinement of behavioral techniques for assessing sensory and motor processes, and (3) the maintenance of sustained performance under conditions of long-term isolation and confinement and preliminary extension of such experimental analysis to man. Numerous studies with primate subjects, including several at Ames Research Center, have been devoted to developing methods for maintaining optimum performance in environments with limited sources of stimulation. Monkeys, baboons, and chimpanzees, for example, have been isolated for periods of longer than 2 years with no decrement in performance on complicated behavioral tasks ([ref.88]). The behavioral techniques used in these studies are closely related to those employed on human subjects under NASA sponsorship at the University of Maryland ([ref.89]). The essence of these techniques is in the proper programing of environmental stimuli ([ref.90]). It is not sufficient to provide the subject with his physiological requirements for survival, but he must be given the psychological motivation for using these provisions. This statement, of course, is an oversimplification of the problem, but it serves to illustrate the essence of these experimental programs.