Another major hypothesis was that there were two or more stages in the information storage process. The final form the information took in the brain was called a brain engram, or memory trace. However, prior to the formation of the engram, a transitory process denoted as "reverberational memory" was postulated to exist for a relatively short time (minutes to hours) (refs. [ref.106] and [ref.107]). This hypothesis was used by Pauling to explain why an elderly chairman of a board could brilliantly summarize a complex 8-hour meeting and yet, after its conclusion and his return to his office, not even remember having attended the meeting. Thus, this individual’s reverberational memory functioned well, but advanced years had seriously impaired his brain’s ability to form a permanent engram. Similar, although less dramatic, observations in other situations are not uncommon. A wide variety of experiments have been conducted to study this aspect of memory and to relate it to the process whereby the information is transformed to a more stable form (refs. [ref.110]-[ref.112]). More recently, the concept of a specific biochemical activity during the process of long-term storage of information has gained considerable favor. Initially, neither the site nor the nature of the change was well defined. Quite recent studies by Krech et al. (refs. [ref.113] and [ref.114]), Bennett et al. ([ref.115]), Rosenzweig et al. (refs. [ref.116] and [ref.117]) support the view that alteration of the levels of acetylcholinesterase at cortical synapses play an important role in information storage. These studies will be discussed in a later section. However, these authors do not claim that the changes observed are unambiguously related to the storage of memory. It may well be that the alterations observed are in some way related to this process but are still secondary to some other, more basic, process. An alternative hypothesis is that the information resides in its ultimate form in some more central structure of the neurone than the synapse. (It has even been postulated that the basic information is stored in nonneuronocortical material.) Perhaps Halstead was the first to postulate the involvement of nucleoprotein in this process ([ref.107]). From the biochemist’s point of view, this is an extremely attractive hypothesis. Both proteins and nucleic acids possess sufficient possible permutations of structure to permit storage of a lifetime’s accumulation of information in an organ the size of the brain. From the previously known ability of the nucleic acids to code genetic information, they are the prime suspects. However, from the known regulatory ability of nucleic acids in specific protein synthesis, it is possible that the final repository is protein. Recent Biochemical Studies