Of course it was a subject to admit of various modes of telling,
according to the tastes, the opportunities, and the prejudices of the
tellers. The popular version of the story, however, was this: that Sir
William declined to press a claim that could not have been resisted,
on account of the peculiarly retiring, unambitious character of him
who should be his immediate successor. His very profession--adopted
and persisted in, in despite of his father's wish--was a palpable
renunciation of all desire for hereditary honor. As the old Judge said,
“The _Libro d, Oro_ of nobility is not the Pharmacopoeia;” and the
thought of a doctor in the peerage might have cost “Garter” a fit of
apoplexy.
Sir William knew this well,--no man better; but the very difficulties
gave all the zest and all the flavor to the pursuit. He lived, too, in
the hope that some Government official might have bethought him of this
objection, that he might spring on him, tiger-like, and tear him in
fragments.
“Let them but tell me this,” muttered he, “and I will rip up the whole
woof, thread by thread, and trace them! The noble duke whose ancestor
was a Dutch pedler, the illustrious marquess whose great-grandfather was
a smuggler, will have to look to it. Before this cause be called on I
would say to them, better to retain me for the Crown! Ay, sirs, such is
my advice to you.”
While these thoughts agitated Sir William's mind, the matter of them
was giving grave and deep preoccupation to the Viceroy. The Cabinet had
repeatedly pressed upon him the necessity of obtaining the Chief Baron's
retirement from the bench,--a measure the more imperative that while
they wanted to provide for an old adherent, they were equally anxious to
replace him in the House by an abler and readier debater; for so is it,
when dulness stops the way, dulness must be promoted,--just as the most
tumble-down old hackney-coach must pass on before my Lord's carriage can
draw up.
“Pemberton must go up,” said the Viceroy. “He made a horrid mess of that
explanation t' other night in the House. His law was laughed at, and
his logic was worse; he really must go on the bench. Can't you hit upon
something, Balfour? Can you devise nothing respecting the Chief Baron?”
“He 'll take nothing but what you won't give him; I hear he insists on
the peerage.”
“I'd give it, I declare,--I 'd give it to-morrow. As I told the Premier
t' other day, Providence always takes care that these law lords have
rarely successors. They are life peerages and no more; besides, what
does it matter a man more or less in 'the Lords'? The peer without
hereditary rank and fortune is like the officer who has been raised from
the ranks,--he does not dine at mess oftener than he can help it.”
Balfour applauded the illustration, and resolved to use it as his own.
“I say again,” continued his Excellency, “I'd give it, but they won't
agree with me; they are afraid of the English bar,--they dread what the
benchers of Lincoln's Inn would say.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account