Sir Christopher Wren : $b Scientist, scholar and architectWeaver, Lawrence
History
Sir Christopher Wren : $b Scientist, scholar and architect
Weaver, Lawrence
Architects -- England -- Biography; Wren, Christopher, Sir, 1632-1723
(_a_) _Wren as a Man of Forty_ (Plate II.).--When I saw this, it
was in the possession of the late Mrs. Catherine Pigott. It is now,
I believe, in the possession of the Bishop of Southwell, to whom
it passed on Mrs. Pigott’s death. It is unsigned, and there is no
record as to its authorship. It shows Wren as a young man, and I
had thought it represented him while in the twenties. Mr. Richard
W. Goulding, F.S.A., dates the cravat about 1675, which would make
Wren forty-three. The modelling of the face is not unlike that of the
Pearce bust, which tends to confirm the age as about forty.
(_b_) _The Wadham College Portrait_ (Plate XIII.).--This is in
itself a poor piece of painting, and has a vague history. It is an
1825 copy by John Smith, of Oxford, deriving ultimately, it is said,
from a Kneller portrait at Lambeth Palace, which, I am informed,
has disappeared. It seems rather to be based on the Sheldonian
portrait, which was attributed by Dallaway to Thornhill, “painted in
conjunction with Verrio and Kneller.” I give the unlikely story of
its authorship as it is told, adding only that as the plan in Wren’s
hand shows the St. Paul’s of the Warrant Design or later, it must be
after 1675, and therefore Wren is depicted as a man of forty-three or
more, probably a good deal more, for he is markedly older than in the
last mentioned.
(_c_) _Bust by Edward Pearce at the Ashmolean_ (Plate V.).--This
beautiful work has been dated 1673, by a letter written by
Christopher, the architect’s son, and quoted by Mr. Lionel Cust. It
may well be Wren as a man of forty-one, and the younger Christopher’s
date can be accepted, but he was very casual in his chronologies.
(_d_) _The Royal Society Portrait._--The legend on the frame says
this picture is by Michael Wright, but Mr. Collins Baker attributes
it, on the ground of style, to Riley and Closterman in collaboration.
He claims that it is the basis of the Kirkall engraving (see next
note). If so, Kirkall turned the face the other way. The view of St.
Paul’s shows a transitional design between the Warrant Design with
its nightmare steeple and the dome as built. The clock towers are
almost exactly like the intermediate design preserved at All Souls. I
suggest it shows a man of seventy.
(_e_) _The Kirkall Engraving after Closterman_ (Plate XV.).--This
rare portrait was given to me by Mrs. Pigott shortly before her
death, and apart from its having been, as she told me, an heirloom
in the Wren family, it has an interest as showing Elisha Kirkall’s
“chiaroscuro” style of engraving interpreting Closterman’s portrait.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account