Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the LyceumFitzgerald, Percy
General
Sir Henry Irving—A Record of Over Twenty Years at the Lyceum
Fitzgerald, Percy
Irving, Henry, Sir, 1838-1905
On December 19, 1886, the piece was produced. There was the now
invariable excitement of a Lyceum _première_, and there were stories
of frantic efforts, grovellings, implorings, etc., to obtain a seat. A
peer had actually been seen in the gallery—and was more than content
with his place. The Royal Family were in their box, and the Prince, then
in mourning, watched the play from behind the scenes. Mephistopheles
was destined for many a night to give the keenest enjoyment to vast
audiences. It was, indeed, a most original conception. With successive
performances he enriched it with innumerable telling and grotesque
touches; for, as I have said, the adapter had “laid out” the character on
rather conventional lines. In spite of all these defects, he suggested
the notion of “uncanniness” and a supernatural _diablerie_. His antic
scaring of the women at the church-door will be recalled by many.
Miss Terry’s Marguerite was full of pathos and poetry, occasionally
suggesting, as in the “Jewel” scene, the operatic heroine. But at the
first performance it became plain that a serious mistake had been made
in the choice of Conway for the hero, Faust. He seemed scarcely to feel
or understand the part; there was a lack of passion and sympathy. It
was, indeed, an overwhelming burden for a player whose gifts lay in the
direction of light comedy.
But on one Saturday night the audience was somewhat astonished to see
before them a new Faust, one who, moreover, came on with a book in his
hand, which he continued to read aloud even after Mephisto had paid him
his visit through the steam clouds. It proved that Conway was suffering
from gout, and Alexander, resigning his own character to Tyars, took the
_rôle_ of Faust, which on the following night he assumed permanently, and
“discharged” in the regular way. Considering the shortness of the notice,
he performed this awkward duty _en vrai artiste_—as, indeed, might be
expected.[40] However, the cast was further strengthened by the excellent
Mrs. Stirling, whose part was scarcely worthy of her. Placing a strong
performer in a part that is inferior in strength, instead of improving or
fortifying, only further brings out the poverty of the character.
In this piece numerous scientific devices were introduced to add to
the effect, such as the clouds of steam which veiled the apparition of
Mephistopheles, a device of French origin. This is scarcely illusive, as
it is attended by an unmistakable “hissing” sound, as of a locomotive;
it seems what it is—namely, steam. The blue electric light flashed with
weird effect as the swords of Valentine and Faust crossed. But here again
there was an electric wire and “contact,” and a current “switched on.”
It may be paradoxical to say so, but these “advances” in scenic art are
really retrograde steps.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account