Flower, William Henry, 1831-1899; Zoologists -- Great Britain -- Biography
An excellent example of this is offered by the development of
“cannon-bones” in the lower portion of the limbs of the members of the
horse tribe on the one hand and those of the deer and antelopes on the
other; the object of this lengthening and strengthening of this part
of the limb being in both instances the attainment of increased speed.
Whereas, however in the one instance the cannon-bone is formed from one
original element, in the other it is the result of the fusion of two
such elements. In this case, indeed, the difference in the structure of
this part of the skeleton in the two groups is so apparent as to leave
no reasonable doubt as to the remoteness of the affinity between their
respective ancestors. There is, however, a certain group of extinct South
American hoofed mammals in which the cannon-bone corresponds exactly
in origin and structure with that of the horse, from which it might be
assumed that the two animals were closely related, whereas, from other
evidence, we know that they are widely sundered. Approximately similar
structures are therefore in many instances far from being indications of
genetic affinity between the animals in which they respectively occur.
Before the occurrence of this parallelism was recognised by naturalists
as an important factor in their development, such resemblances were,
however, frequently regarded as indications of a common parentage, so
that animals which had comparatively little to do with one another were
brigaded as members of the same assemblage.
With these preliminary remarks, we may proceed to a general survey of
Sir William’s zoological work. It has, however, been found convenient to
relegate the consideration of his numerous memoirs on the Cetacea to the
next chapter, by which means their connection will be made more apparent
than if they were discussed among those on other sections of zoology.
The first zoological paper (and indeed the first scientific work of
any description) published by Flower seems to have been that on the
dissection of one of the African lemurs belonging to the genus _Galago_,
which appeared in the Zoological Society’s _Proceedings_ for 1852, and
serves to prove, as mentioned in the first chapter, that the author was
at that time holding the post of Curator of the Museum of the Middlesex
Hospital. The paper itself is of little importance, dealing only with the
structure of the muscles and viscera of the species in question.
The next paper on the list, which appeared in the same journal for 1860,
was also written during this part of Flower’s career; it is one of the
few devoted to the anatomy of birds, and describes the gizzard of the
Nicobar pigeon and other graminivorous species.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account