Flower, William Henry, 1831-1899; Zoologists -- Great Britain -- Biography
The earlier memoirs of this series published (in the _Philosophical
Transactions_), writes Professor M’Intosh in the _Scottish Review_ for
1900, “formed important evidence in the discussions which took place
between Owen and Huxley in regard to the posterior lobe of the brain,
the posterior cornu, and the hippocampus minor.” Professor Owen, at the
Cambridge Meeting of the British Association in 1862, maintained, from
specimens of the human brain in spirit, and from a cast of the interior
of the gorilla’s skull, that in man the posterior lobes of the brain
overlapped the cerebellum, whereas in the gorilla they did not; that
these characters are constant, and therefore he had decided to place man,
with his overlapping posterior lobes, the existence of a posterior horn
in the lateral ventricle, and the presence of a hippocampus minor in
the posterior horn, under the special division Archencephala. Moreover,
he grouped with these features the distinctive characters of the foot
of man, and showed how it differed from that of all monkeys. Flower’s
accurate investigations enabled Huxley to substantiate his antagonistic
position to Owen’s doctrines, viz., that these structures, instead of
being the attributes of man, are precisely the most marked cerebral
characters common to man with the apes. Huxley also asserted that the
differences between the foot of man and that of the higher apes were of
the same order, and but slightly different in degree from those which
separated one ape from another.
The result of this controversy was the overthrow (except in the mind
and works of its author) of Owen’s separation of man on the one hand
as the representative of a primary group—the Archencephala; and of
apes, monkeys, Carnivora, Ungulates, Sirenians, and Cetaceans on the
other hand, as forming a second group—the Gyrencephala.[6] As will
be seen from the above quotation, this result was very largely due to
the work of Flower, although it was brought into prominent notice by
the superior fighting powers of Huxley, who was also an older, and at
the time at anyrate, a better-known man. It may be added that Flower
himself subsequently abandoned the use of the term “Quadrumana,” as
distinguishing apes and monkeys on the one hand from man, as “Bimana,”
on the other, and brigaded all altogether under their Linnæan title
“Primates.”
The contributions of Flower to our knowledge of (and, it may be added, to
the clearing up of misconceptions in regard to) the mammalian brain, was,
however, by no means confined to the Primates (man, apes, monkeys, and
lemurs). On the contrary, his researches were of equal—if not indeed of
more—importance with regard to the structure of that organ in the lower
groups of the class, namely the marsupials and the monotremes (duckbill
platypus and spiny ant-eater).
In the well-known Reade Lecture of 1859, Professor Owen expressed himself
as follows with regard to the brain of the two groups last mentioned:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account