Flower, William Henry, 1831-1899; Zoologists -- Great Britain -- Biography
Recent researches have, however, tended to show that Owen was after all
right in denying the existence of a corpus callosum in the latter groups.
Even allowing for this correction, the result of this important paper was
to discredit among all zoologists capable of forming an adequate opinion
on the subject Owen’s proposed fourfold division of the Mammalia into
Lyencephala, Lissencephala, Gyrencephala, and Archencephala. And these
terms have now completely disappeared from zoological literature.
In those days it required no considerable amount of courage to attack
a man of Owen’s established social and scientific position on an
important subject like this; and Flower’s triumph was therefore the more
conspicuous. Of course such of these discoveries as are valid, if they
had not been made by him, would have been made later on by somebody else,
as they merely required accurate dissection and observation. But this
may be said of every discovery of a like nature; and Flower is entitled
to all credit for having worked out the subject in the way he did. It
may be added, that, with our present knowledge of mammalian morphology,
a classification based on the characters of the brain is manifestly
based on a misconception from first to last; the degree of development
and specialisation of that organ being purely adaptive features, and
therefore not dependent upon structural relationships. Had Owen’s
classification been maintained, it would have been necessary to assign
the primitive Carnivora and Ungulata to a group quite apart from the one
containing their existing representatives.
In the light of modern research, it cannot now be held that the result
of Flower’s investigations in this direction was to demonstrate the
existence of a corpus callosum to the brain in all the members of the
mammalian class.
In another paper, dealing with the brain of the Javan loris, published
in the _Transactions_ of the Zoological Society, Flower made a further
contribution to the study of this part of the organism. Previous to the
appearance of the memoir on the marsupial and monotreme brain, Flower had
published, in the _Natural History Review_ for 1864, one on the number of
cervical vertebræ in the Sirenia (manati and dugong). Apart from several
papers on whales and dolphins, which, as already mentioned, are reserved
for consideration in a later chapter, the next noteworthy zoological
contribution from Flower’s pen appears to be one on the gular pouch of
the great bustard, published in the Zoological Society’s _Proceedings_
for 1865. This pouch, which, it may be observed is confined to the
cock-bird, and inflated during the breeding season, is a very remarkable
structure, which has recently been described in greater detail by Mr. W.
P. Pycraft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account