Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His DiscoursesWoolston, Thomas
Religion
Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His Discourses
Woolston, Thomas
Gibson, Edmund, 1669-1748; Jesus Christ -- Miracles -- Early works to 1800; Smalbroke, Richard, 1672-1749
"You Christians pay Adoration to _Jesus_, whom you believe to be a
divine Author of Religion, sent of God for the Instruction,
Reformation and Salvation of Mankind, and what induces you to this
Belief of him, is, (besides some obscure Prophecies, which you can't
agree upon, and which neither your selves, nor any body else
understands the Application of) the History of his Miracles: But I
wonder, you should have a good opinion of him for his Miracles,
which, if he wrought no better than what are recorded of him, by
your _Evangelists_, are, if duly consider'd, enough to alienate your
Hearts from him. I can't spare time now to examine into all of them,
but according to the cursory Observation I have made on them, there
is not one so well circumstanced, as to merit a considerate Man's
belief, that it was the Work of an omnipotent, all-wise, just and
good Agent. Some of them are absurd Tales, others foolish Facts,
others unjust Actions, others ludicrous Pranks, others jugling
Tricks, others magical Enchantments; and if many of them had been
better and greater Operations than they are, and of a more useful
and stupendous Nature than they seem to be; yet the first Miracle
that he wrought, _viz._ that of his _turning Water into Wine_ at an
extravagant and voluptuous Wedding at _Cana_ of _Galilee_, is enough
to turn our Stomachs against all the rest. It is in itself enough to
beget in us an ill opinion of _Jesus_, and to prepossess us with an
aversion to his Religion, without farther Examination into it. It is
enough to make us suspect his other Miracles, of what Name soever,
to be of a base, magical, and diabolical Extraction; or he had never
set up for a divine worker of Miracles with so ill a grace. Would
any sober, grave, serious and divine Person, as you Christians
suppose _Jesus_ to have been, have vouchsafed his Presence at a
Wedding; where such Levities, Diversions and Excesses (in our Nation
of the _Jews_, as well as in all others) were indulg'd on such
Occasions, as were not fit to be seen, much less countenanc'd by the
_Saint_, you would make of him. If your _Jesus_, his Mother, and his
Disciples had not been merry Folks in themselves, they would have
declined the Invitation of the _Bridegroom_; nay, it they had been
at all graver and more serious People than ordinary, no Invitation
had been given to such _Spoil-Sports_: But boon Companions they
were, and of comical Conversation, or there had been at a Wedding no
Room for them. You Christians may fancy, what you please, of _Jesus_
and his Mother's Saintship; but the very Text of the Story implies,
they were Lovers of good Fellowship and Excess too, upon occasion;
or he had never, upon her Intimation, turn'd so large a quantity of
Water into Wine, after all or most of the Company were far gone with
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account