Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His DiscoursesWoolston, Thomas
Religion
Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His Discourses
Woolston, Thomas
Gibson, Edmund, 1669-1748; Jesus Christ -- Miracles -- Early works to 1800; Smalbroke, Richard, 1672-1749
"_Jesus_, it is manifest, rais'd not the dead at all. The only
Person, that Christians can reasonably pretend, he did raise, was
_Jairus_'s Daughter, whom _Matthew_ writes of; and she, according to
the Story was only in a Sleep, or an Extacy, when _Jesus_ revived
her. But the _Galileans_, who were after a Time call'd _Christians_,
finding their Account in a Resurrection-Miracle; _Luke_, for the
former Advantage of the Cause, devised another Story of better
Circumstances, in the Widow of _Naim_'s Son: But this not being so
great a Miracle, as the Church still wanted; _John_, when no body
was alive to contradict and expostulate with him for it, trumps up a
long Story of a thumping Miracle, in _Jesus_'s raising of _Lazarus_,
who had been not only dead, but buried so long that he stank again.
But to prove the Story of this Miracle to be false and fabulous, we
need say no more than that it was last recorded. If there had been
any Truth in it, the first _Evangelist_ would have remember'd us of
it.
"We don't suppose, that you Christians, because of your Prejudices,
will subscribe to this Account, that we thus give of the Rise of
these Miracles: But this is certain, that if these three Miracles
had not been reported of _Jesus_, but of _Mahomet_, in the same
disorder of Time, by three different Historians, you would
presently have scented the Forgery and Imposture: You would justly
have affirm'd that the three Stories were apparently three Fables
and Falsehoods; and that the three Historians visibly strove to
outstretch each other: That the _first_ was sparing and modest in
his Romance; and the _second_, being sensible of the Insufficiency
of the former's Tale, devises a Miracle of a bigger Size; which
still not proving sufficient to the End proposed; the _third_
Writer, rather than his Prophet's Honour should sink for want of a
Resurrection-Miracle, forges a Story of a monstrously huge one;
against which it is, and always will be Objection enough, that it
was not related by the first Historian. So would you Christians
argue against these three Miracles in another Impostor's Case; and
there is not a judicious _Critic_ in the Universe, that would not
approve of the Argument, and applaud the Force of it, tho' you will
not endure the Thoughts of it in the Case of your _Jesus_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account