Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His DiscoursesWoolston, Thomas
Religion
Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His Discourses
Woolston, Thomas
Gibson, Edmund, 1669-1748; Jesus Christ -- Miracles -- Early works to 1800; Smalbroke, Richard, 1672-1749
"It is a sad Misfortune, that attends our modern enquiry after
Truth, that there are no other Memorials extant of the Life and
Miracles of _Jesus_, than what are written by his own Disciples.
Not only old Time has devour'd, but Christians themselves, (which
in the Opinion of the impartial makes for us) when they got Power
into their Hands, wilfully destroy'd many Writings of our
Ancestors, as well as of _Celsus_ and _Porphiry_ and others, which
they could not answer; otherwise I doubt not but they would have
given us clear Light into a the Imposture of _Lazarus_'s
Resurrection: But if _Jesus_, according to his own _Evangelists_,
was arraign'd for a _Deceiver_ and _Blasphemer_, in pretending to
the Sonship and Power of God by his Miracles; in all Probability
this Piece of Fraud in _Lazarus_ was one Article of the Indictment
against him; and what makes it very likely, is that the _Chief
Priests_ and _Pharisees_, from the Date of this pretended Miracle,
_took Council together to put him to Death_, not clandestinely or
tumultuously to murder him, but judicially to punish him with
Death, which, if they proved their Indictment by credible and
sufficient Witnesses, he was most worthy of.
"As it is plain from the Story in _John_, that there was a Dispute
among the By-standers at _Lazarus_'s Resurrection, whether it was a
real Miracle or not; so it is the Opinion of us _Jews_, which is of
the Nature of a Tradition, that the _Chief-Priests_ and civil
Magistrates of _Bethany_, for the better Determination of the
Dispute and quieting of the Minds of the People, requir'd that
_Jesus_ should re-act the Miracle upon another Person, there lately
dead and buried. But _Jesus_ declining this Test of his Power, the
whole Multitude of Believers as well as of Unbelievers before,
question'd the Resurrection of _Lazarus_; and were highly incens'd
against both him and _Jesus_ for the Deceit in it. And this was
_one_ Reason among others of that vehement and Universal Outcry and
Demand, at _Jesus_'s Tryal, for his Crucifixion. I'll not answer
for the Certainty of this Tradition or Opinion, but as the
Expedient was obvious, so it has the Face of Truth and Credibility;
and for the Proof of it, I need only appeal to Christian _Priests_
and _Magistrates_; whether, under a Dispute of a Miracle of that
Consequence, they would not require, for full Satisfaction, it
should be acted over again; and, if the _Juggler_ refused, whether
there would not be a general Clamour of People of all Ranks for his
_Execution_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account