Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His DiscoursesWoolston, Thomas
Religion
Six Discourses on the Miracles of Our Saviour, and Defences of His Discourses
Woolston, Thomas
Gibson, Edmund, 1669-1748; Jesus Christ -- Miracles -- Early works to 1800; Smalbroke, Richard, 1672-1749
"The _Bishop_'s sole Aim and Design is to vindicate the _litteral
Story_ of our Saviour's Miracles, against my rational and
authoritative Objections to it. And to this Purpose he wrangles with
me, where he can, about the Sense of this and that Citation out of
the Fathers; and after he has forc'd another Sense on it, than the
Words do naturally bear, then he insults me for a Misrepresentation.
And where he meets with a plain Testimony out of the Fathers, which
he can't mangle nor strain to his Purpose, he fluently passes by it;
tho' he would have his _Readers_ to believe, he has vindicated the
litteral Story against my Authorities, and shewn that the Fathers
were all on his Side.
"He complains of my Mutilations of the Fathers, and of making too
curt Citations out of them; which is true, but more to my own
Disadvantage than to his. But, what is Matter of grand Triumph to
the _Bishop_, is, that I have quoted _spurious_ Works of the
Fathers for _genuine_ ones. And here he takes great Pains, and
wastes Time and Paper, to prove that _this_ and _that_ Book does
not belong to the Author under whose Name I cite it; and then has a
Fling at me for want of Skill in _Criticism_. But can the _Bishop_
be so weak, as to think, I did not know when I quoted a _spurious_
Work? Supposing the _Book_ I quoted do not belong to the reputed
Author, but to some other Writer, what's that to the Question
between us? The Citation is no less the Testimony of Antiquity, and
it's no matter whose Name it bears. If the _Bishop_ had thought a
little on this, he might have spared some Sheets of Paper, which he
has in vain wasted, to the Loss of his Readers Time and Money.
"Again, where my rational Arguments against the _Letter_ seem to
the _Bishop_ to be weak and inconclusive; there, to do him
Justice, he handsomly turns upon me with his Reasoning, and
admonishes me of my Spitefulness against the _Letter_, or I would
never use such a slight Argument. But where I pinch and bear hard
upon the _Letter_, and the Jest is not to be digested, there,
instead of Reasoning against me, he makes a hideous Out-cry of
Buffoonery, Blasphemy, and Infidelity; and calls upon the Civil
Magistrate for his Help, or their Religion, and their _All_ is in
Danger, through the impious Writings of untoward Infidels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account