_P. S._ To Mr. _T. Ray_, the Author of a _Discourse_, call'd _Our Saviour's Miracles vindicated_, &c. As I, _Sir_, enter'd the _Press_, you came forth, or I might possibly have paid more of my Respects to you another Way. But upon mature Consideration, I found a properer Reply could not be made to you, than is the foregoing Discourse; which, if you are not sick of your former Performance, will find you some more Work. And that you may write more pertinently against this Discourse, than you did against my other, I'll give you some Instructions, _viz._ if you think of writing to the Purpose, you must prove these two Things; _First_, that the Fathers did not hold the Stories of _Jesus_'s Miracles to be typical and figurative; and _Secondly_, that _Jesus_'s Miracles neither will nor can receive a mysterious and more wonderful Accomplishment. But you have not said one Syllable to either of these Points; consequently have written nothing to the Purpose against me. As for Instance; In the Miracle of _Jesus_'s _driving the Buyers and Sellers out of the Temple_: You should prove, _First_ that the Fathers don't hold that Miracle to be typical of the future Ejection of _Bishops_, _Priests_, and _Deacons_ out of the Church, that make Merchandize of the Gospel: And _Secondly_, that it was impossible that the Miracle should receive such an Accomplishment. But you have done nothing of this. So, if you should attempt again to write against this Discourse, as for Instance, against my Explication of the Miracle of _Jesus_'s healing the Woman, that _had an Issue of Blood_; you must prove that _that_ Story neither was in the Opinion of the Fathers Typical, nor could receive a mystical Accomplishment; or you may as well hold your Peace. And after all, whether your Reasonings for the Letter of Christ's Miracles, are equal to mine against it, let our Readers judge, who will easily discern, that you jump over my choicest Invectives against the Letter, as if you was afraid of being touch'd by them. As to your charging me falsly in one or two Places, with Misrepresentations of the Fathers, I'll expostulate that Matter with you, when I hear that the _Bishop_ of _London_ gives your Performance, the Reputation of a solid, and substantial one, by a Change of your _Cloak_ into a _Gown_, which you seem to aim at; or you had never so besmear'd the _Bishop_ with your Compliments, nor had been so mealy-mouth'd as to the Point of Liberty. But what need you, _Sir_, have told the World, that you take me for an _Unbeliever of the Scriptures_. If the _Bishop_'s wise Prosecution of me for an _Infidel_ had not given you the Hint, you could never of your self have made that Discovery. And why did you not join the Fathers with me in Unbelief? I thought I had been of the same Faith with them. A Man of your Penetration into another's Principles, will, I suppose, from this present going Discourse, conclude me to be a downright _Atheist_. And what must I do then to clear my self!