Sixty Years in Southern California, 1853-1913: Containing the Reminiscences of Harris NewmarkNewmark, Harris
History
Sixty Years in Southern California, 1853-1913: Containing the Reminiscences of Harris Newmark
Newmark, Harris
California, Southern; Los Angeles (Calif.)
Usurers were here from the beginning, and their tax was often
ruinously exorbitant. So much did they charge for money, in fact, that
from two to twelve and a half per cent. _a week_ was paid; this
brought about the loss of many early estates. I recollect, for
example, that the owner of several thousand acres of land borrowed two
hundred dollars, at an interest charge of twelve and a half per cent.
for each week, from a resident of Los Angeles whose family is still
prominent in California; and that when principal and interest amounted
to twenty-two thousand dollars, the lender foreclosed and thus
ingloriously came into possession of a magnificent property.
For at least twenty years after I arrived in Los Angeles, the credit
system was so irregular as to be no system at all. Land and other
values were exceedingly low, there was not much ready money, and while
the credit of a large rancher was small compared with what his rating
would be today because of the tremendous advances in land and stock,
much longer time was then given on running accounts than would be
allowed now. Bills were generally settled after the harvest. The
wine-grower would pay his score when the grape crop was sold; and the
cattleman would liquidate what he could when he sold his cattle. In
other words, there was no credit foundation whatever; indeed, I have
known accounts to be carried through three and four dry seasons.
It is true, also, that many a fine property was lost through the mania
of the Californian for gambling, and it might be just as well to add
that the loose credit system ruined many. I believe, in fact, it is
generally recognized in certain lines of business that the too
flexible local fiscal practice of to-day is the descendant of the
careless methods of the past.
My early experiences as a merchant afforded me a good opportunity to
observe the character and peculiarities of the people with whom I had
to deal. In those days a disposition to steal was a common weakness on
the part of many, especially Indians, and merchants generally suffered
so much from the evil that a sharp lookout had to be kept. On one
occasion, I saw a native woman deftly abstract a pair of shoes and
cleverly secrete them on her person; and at the conclusion of her
purchases, as she was about to leave the store, I stepped up to her,
and with a "_¡Dispense me Vd.!_" quietly recovered the _zapatos_. The
woman smiled, each of us bowed, the pilfering patron departed, and
nothing further was ever said of the affair.
This proneness to steal was frequently utilized by early and astute
traders, who kept on hand a stock of very cheap but gaudy jewelry
which was placed on the counter within easy reach--a device which
prevented the filching of more valuable articles, while it attracted,
at the same time, this class of customers; and as soon as the esteemed
customers ceased to buy, the trays of tempting trinkets were removed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account