Sketch of the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage, Esq.Menabrea, Luigi Federico
Science
Sketch of the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage, Esq.
Menabrea, Luigi Federico
Babbage, Charles, 1791-1871; Numerical analysis
By Operation 6, a positive quantity is turned into a
negative quantity, by simply subtracting the quantity from
a column which has only zero upon it. (The sign at the top of
[Pg 62]
would become—during this process.)
Operation 7 will be unintelligible, unless it be remembered that if
we were calculating for instead of , Operation 6
would have completed the computation of itself; in
which case the engine, instead of continuing its processes, would
have to put on ; and then either
to stop altogether, or to begin Operations 1, 2 ... 7 all over again
for value of (= 2), in order to enter on the computation of
; (having however taken care, previous to this
recommencement, to make the number on , equal to
two, by the addition of unity to the former on that
column). Now Operation 7 must either bring out a result equal to
zero (if ); or a result greater than zero, as
in the present case; and the engine follows the one or the other of
the two courses just explained, contingently on the one or the other
result of Operation 7. In order fully to perceive the necessity of
this experimental operation, it is important to keep in mind
what was pointed out, that we are not treating a perfectly isolated
and independent computation, but one out of a series of antecedent and
prospective computations.
Cards 8, 9, 10 produce
.
In Operation 9 we see an example of an upper index which again
becomes a value after having passed front preceding values to zero.
has successively been ,
, , ,
; and, from the nature of the office which
, performs in the calculation, its index will
continue to go through further changes of the same description, which,
if examined, will be found to be regular and periodic.
Card 12 has to perform the same office as Card 7 did in the preceding
section; since, if had been = 2, the 11th operation would have
completed the computation of .
Cards 13 to 20 make . Since
always consists of factors, has three
factors; and it will be seen that Cards 13, 14, 15, 16 make the second
of these factors, and then multiply it with the first; and that 17, 18,
19, 20 make the third factor, and then multiply this with the product
of the two former factors.
Card 23 has the office of Cards 11 and 7 to perform, since if
were = 3, the 21st and 22nd operations would complete the computation
of . As our case is , the computation
will continue one more stage; and we must now direct attention to the
fact, that in order to compute it is merely necessary
precisely to repeat the group of Operations 13 to 20; and then, in
order to complete the computation of , to repeat
Operations 21, 22.
[Pg 63]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account