Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulityDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
Sketches of imposture, deception, and credulity
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Common fallacies; Impostors and imposture
The arguments used by Wolf and Heyne are, firstly, the improbability
that in such a dark age as that in which Homer is reputed to have
lived, and of which so few traces are left, one man should have been
capable of composing works of such extent, consistency, and poetical
elevation, as the Iliad or Odyssey.
Secondly, that poems of such a length should have been composed, and
preserved entire, without being committed to writing. Now there is not
the least trace, even in tradition, of any complete copy of Homer’s
works, till the existence of the Athenian edition, or at least of
that of Lycurgus. No notice is taken in the poems of any epistolary
correspondence, though in the Odyssey many opportunities occur where
such might have been introduced.
Thirdly, the Greek alphabet was not received at Athens till the
ninety-fourth Olympiad, that is, about four hundred and three years
before Christ, whereas the works of Homer were dated from the nine
hundred and seventh year before Christ. The writing materials also
must have been scanty and inadequate to the preservation of a poem of
fifteen thousand lines; stone and metal being the only materials on
which, in early times, characters were imprinted.
Fourthly, in these ancient poems, no reference is ever made to
written treaties; treaties being then only verbal, and ratified by
superstitious rites.
Fifthly, the rhapsodists flourished in the earliest times, answering
to the Celtic bards in our history; and all who followed this
profession recited from memory; by the exercise of which faculty they
derived honour and emolument. Without the modern aids to composition,
how, it was asked, could any poet keep the plan, or previous part of
his design, in his recollection? or, if that were possible, could he
have ever expected to procure an audience, to whom such a work should
be submitted?
It is more than probable, that the original poems, or series of
poetical sketches, were exposed to perpetual variation, from passing
through the heads of the rhapsodists; many of whom were, doubtless,
also poets, and who, in the warmth of recitation, would make changes
unconsciously, or, perhaps, purposely introduce them, to produce
greater effect on their hearers. From Ælian we learn that anciently the
books of the Iliad or Odyssey were never recited in the order in which
they now stand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account