Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sourcesWhite, James
Philosophy
Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sources
White, James
Miller, William, 1782-1849
“‘When I was of age, I settled in a village where all the
heads of the families were deists, as they were then called,
and they put into my hands all the deistical writings of that
age. I soon became one of them, and the consequence was, I
denied the Bible being of divine origin, calling it a “book of
priestcraft,” and argued that the professors of it themselves
must, if honest, concede that it could not be from God; because
it professed to be a revelation from God, and yet more than
half was a mystery which could not be understood. And some
went as far as to say we ought not to try to understand it.
This, to my mind, was a plain and palpable contradiction. I
therefore rejected the Bible, when I ought to have rejected
the expounders of it. Thus, from 1804 to 1816, I was a firm,
and, as I then thought, a consistent, opposer of the Christian
faith. In 1816, by the grace of God, my eyes were opened to see
the weakness and folly of my own faith, founded on nothing but
the philosophy, assumptions and fancies of erring mortals. I
saw a great want of evidence for a faith in these matters, more
substantial and certain than anything I then had. I felt in my
inmost soul that eternal consequences might hang upon my faith
in these things, for anything to the contrary which I could
show. I had often laughed at my Christian friends for having
a “_blind faith_,” believing what they could not understand.
I now saw that my faith was as _blind_ as theirs, if not more
so, for I could prove nothing hereafter, and of course I had no
reasonable hope.
“‘This brought me to examine for myself the evidence of the
Christian’s hope. I therefore laid by my former prejudices,
prepossessions, commentators, writers, pro and con, and
determined in my own mind to examine the Bible for myself. And
if the Bible did prove itself to be of divine origin, I would
believe it, let the consequences be as they might; but if it
did not, then I would reject it and be a deist still. Then I
began the Bible, determined in my own mind to know whether God
or man was the author. I spent the greater part of two years
in reading and comparing scripture with scripture, prophecy
with history, and I had not gone half through with the reading
of it, before I was perfectly satisfied of its divine origin.
No mortal man, or men, could have written with such harmony,
wisdom, and truth, without inspiration. The Bible answered all
my inquiries, settled all my doubts, established my faith, and
gave me hope which has been nearly or quite twenty-seven years
an anchor to my soul. I have seen much of it fulfilled, since
then, and I can truly say, If there is any one thing on earth
which I love above all others, it is the Bible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account