Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sourcesWhite, James
Philosophy
Sketches of the Christian life and public labors of William Miller : $b Gathered from his memoir by the late Sylvester Bliss, and from other sources
White, James
Miller, William, 1782-1849
“‘But while I frankly acknowledge my disappointment in the
exact time, I wish to inquire whether my teachings have been
thereby materially affected. My view of exact time depended
entirely upon the accuracy of chronology; of this I had no
absolute demonstration; but as no evidence was presented to
invalidate it, I deemed it my duty to rely on it as certain,
until it should be disproved. Besides, I not only rested on
received chronology, but I selected the earliest dates in the
circle of a few years on which chronologers have relied for the
date of the events from which to reckon, because I believed
them to be best sustained, and because I wished to have my eye
on the earliest time at which the Lord might be expected. Other
chronologers had assigned later dates for the events from which
I reckoned; and if they are correct we are only brought into
the circle of a few years, during which we may rationally look
for the Lord’s appearing. As the prophetic periods, counting
from the dates from which I have reckoned, have not brought us
to the end, and as I cannot tell the exact time that chronology
may vary from my calculations, I can only live in continual
expectation of the event. I am persuaded that I cannot be far
out of the way, and I believe that God will still justify my
preaching to the world.[88]
“‘With respect to other features of my views, I can see no
reason to change my belief. We are living under the last form
of the divided fourth kingdom, which brings us to the end. The
prophecies which were to be fulfilled previous to the end have
been so far fulfilled that I find nothing in them to delay the
Lord’s coming. The signs of the times thicken on every hand;
and the prophetic periods must certainly, I think, have brought
us into the neighborhood of the event.
“‘There is not a point in my belief in which I am not sustained
by some one of the numerous writers who have opposed my views.
Prof. Bush, the most gentlemanly of my opponents, admits that I
am correct in the time, with the exception of the precise day
or year; and this is all for which I contend. That the 70 weeks
are 490 years, and the 1260 and 2300 days are so many years,
are admitted by Messrs. Bush, Hinton, and Jarvis. That the 2300
days and 70 weeks commence at the same time, Prof. Bush does
not deny. And Dr. Jarvis admits that the former carry us to the
resurrection and Judgment. Prof. Bush, Dr. Jarvis, Mr. Hinton,
and Mr. Morris, admit that the legs of iron and fourth beast
are Rome, and that the little horn of Dan. 7 is papacy, while
Dr. Jarvis and Mr. Hinton admit that the exceeding great horn
of Daniel 8 is Rome. The literal resurrection of the body, the
end of the world, and a personal coming of Christ, have not
been questioned by several who have written against me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account