Slavery and the ConstitutionBowditch, William I. (William Ingersoll)
Religion
Slavery and the Constitution
Bowditch, William I. (William Ingersoll)
Enslaved persons -- United States -- Social conditions; Slavery -- United States
"With respect to that part of the second section of the first
article, it was urged that no principle could justify taking slaves
into computation in apportioning the number of representatives a
State should have in the government;--that _it involved the
absurdity of increasing the power of a State in making laws for
freemen, in proportion as that State violated the rights of
freedom_;--that it might be proper to take slaves into
consideration, when taxes were to be apportioned, because it had a
tendency to discourage slavery; but to take them into account in
giving representation tended to encourage the slave-trade, and to
make it the interest of the States to continue that infamous
traffic."
In the North Carolina Convention, Wm. R. Davie, a member of the
Convention who framed the Constitution, said:--
"The Eastern States had great jealousies on this subject. They
insisted that their cows and horses were equally entitled to
representation; that the one was property as well as the other. It
became our duty, on the other hand, to acquire as much weight as
possible in the legislation of the Union; and, as the Northern
States were more populous in whites, this only could be done by
insisting that a certain proportion of our _slaves_ should make a
part of the computed population."
In the South Carolina Convention, General Chas. C. Pinckney, another of
the framers of the Constitution, said:--
"We were at a loss for some time for a rule to ascertain the
proportionate wealth of the States. At last we thought that the
productive labor of the inhabitants was the best rule for
ascertaining their wealth. In conformity to this rule, joined to a
spirit of concession, we determined that representatives should be
apportioned among the several States, by adding to the whole number
of free persons, three-fifths of the _slaves_."
PERMISSION OF THE AFRICAN SLAVE-TRADE. (Const. Art. 1, sec. 9.)
In the Massachusetts Convention, Mr. Dawes, speaking in relation to Art.
1, sec. 2, said that--
"Gentlemen would do well to connect the passage in dispute with
another article in the Constitution, that permits Congress, in the
year 1808, wholly to prohibit the importation of _slaves_, and in
the meantime to impose a duty of ten dollars a head on such blacks
as should be imported before that period."
Many persons spoke in the Convention on this section; and, among others,
Judge Dana rejoiced that a door was opened by it for the annihilation of
the slave-trade.
In the Pennsylvania Convention, Mr. Wilson said:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account