Slavery in Pennsylvania: A Dissertation Submitted to the Board of University Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1910Turner, Edward Raymond
History
Slavery in Pennsylvania: A Dissertation Submitted to the Board of University Studies of the Johns Hopkins University in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1910
[260] _J. of H., 1802-1803_, pp. 361, 362; _1804-1805_, p. 61; _Pa.
Gazette_, Feb. 1, 1804; _J. of H., 1811-1812_, pp. 58, 67,
216; _J. of. S., 1820-1821_, p. 33; _Phila. Gazette_, Mar.
6, 1821; _J. of S., 1820-1821_, pp. 105, 308, 469, 531, 532,
535, 536. For the provisions of such a bill--the abolition
of slavery and of servitude until twenty-eight--compensation
of owners--permission for negroes to remain slaves if they
so desired--_cf. House Report_ no. 399 (1826); _J. of H.,
1825-1826_, pp. 370, 375, 396, 497, 498. Also _J. of S.,
1841_, vol. I, 249, 294.
[261] The numbers were 1790, _3737_; 1800, _1706_; 1810, _795_;
1820, _211_; 1830, _67_; 1840, _64_ (?). The U. S. Census
Reports do not mention any after 1840, but it is said that
James Clark of Donegal Township, Lancaster County, held a
slave in 1860. _Cf._ W. J. McKnight, _Pioneer Outline History
of Northwestern Pennsylvania_, 311. It is necessary to remark
that the U. S. Census reported _386_ as the number of slaves
in 1830. As this was in increase of 175 over the number
reported in 1820, it aroused consternation in Pennsylvania and
amazement elsewhere, so that a committee of the Senate was
immediately appointed to investigate. Their account showed
that there had been no increase but a substantial diminution
in numbers; and that the U. S. officers had been grossly
careless, if not positively ignorant in their work. _J. of S.,
1832-1833_, vol. I, 141, 148, 482-487; _Hazard's Register_,
IV, 380; IX, 270-272, 395; XI, 158, 159; _African Repository
and Colonial Journal_, VII, 315.
[262] _Cf. J. of S., 1821-1822_, pp. 214, 215.
[263] _Minutes Tenth American Convention Abol. Sl., Phila., 1805_,
p. 13.
[264] _Stat. at L._, X, 71.
[265] Respublica _v._ Richards, 2 Dallas 224-228; Commonwealth _v._
Smyth, 1 Browne 113, 114; _Laws of Assembly, 1847_, p. 208.
This law was affirmed by the courts in 1849. Kauffman _v._
Oliver 10 _Pa. State Rep._ (Barr), 517-518. It was at times
contested by the citizens of other states, as in the famous
episode of J. H. Wheeler's slaves in 1855. _Cf. Narrative of
Facts in the Case of Passmore Williamson_. In this case the
Federal District Court held that Pa. had no jurisdiction over
the right of transit. In 1860 a negress was brought from Va.
to Pa. She was at once told that she was free; but when her
master returned she went back with him. _Phila. Inquirer_,
Aug. 29, 1860.
[266] _J. of H., 1821-1822_, pp. 628, 637, 950; _J. of S.,
1821-1822_, pp. 325, 330, 331. For a vivid description _cf._
Parrish, _Remarks on the Slavery of the Black People_ (1806),
21.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account