Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1849-1853
When a white family own fifty or one hundred slaves, they can, so long
as their land produces well, afford to be indolent and expensive in
their habits; for though each yields only a small profit, yet each
member of the family has ten or fifteen of these black work-animals
to toil for his support. It is not until the fields grow old, and the
crops grow short, and the negroes and the overseer take nearly all,
that the day of ruin can be no longer postponed. If the family be not
_very_ indolent and _very_ expensive, this inevitable day may not come
before the third generation. But the ruin of small slaveholders is
often accomplished in a single lifetime.
When a white family own five or ten slaves, they cannot afford to
be indolent and expensive in their habits; for one black drudge
cannot support one white gentleman or lady. Yet, because they are
slaveholders, this family will feel some aspirations for a life of
easy gentility; and because field work and kitchen work are negroes’
work, the young gentlemen will dislike to go with the negroes to
dirty field work, and the young ladies will dislike to join the black
sluts in any sort of household labor. Such unthrifty sentiments are
the natural consequence of introducing slaves among the families
of a country, especially negro slaves. They infallibly grow and
spread, creating among the white families a distaste for all servile
labor, and a desire to procure slaves who may take all drudgery off
their hands. Thus general industry gives way by degrees to indolent
relaxation, false notions of dignity and refinement, and a taste for
fashionable luxuries. Then debts slyly accumulate. The result is, that
many families are compelled by their embarrassments to sell off and
leave the country. Many who are unable to buy slaves leave it also,
because they feel degraded, and cannot prosper, where slavery exists.
Citizens of the valley! is it not so? Is not this the chief reason why
your beautiful country does not prosper like the northern valleys?
We have examined the census of counties for the last thirty or forty
years, in Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina, with the view to
discover the law of population in the northern slave states. The
following are among the general results:--
When a county had at first comparatively few slaves, the slave
population, except near the free borders, gained upon the whites, and
most rapidly in the older parts of the country.
The population, as a whole, increased so long as the slaves were
fewer than the whites, but more slowly as the numbers approached to
equality. In our valley, a smaller proportion of slaves had the effect
of a larger one in East Virginia, to retard the increase of population.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account