Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9Anonymous
History
Smuggling & Smugglers in Sussex: The Genuine History of the Inhuman and Unparalleled Murders of Mr. William Galley a Custom-house Officer, and Mr. Daniel Chater, a Shoemaker, by Fourteen Notorious Smugglers, with the Trials and Execution of Seven of the Criminals at Chichester, 1748-9
Anonymous
Crime -- England -- History; Smuggling -- England -- Sussex -- History
The prisoner Jackson said little or nothing, only that he did not kill
the man, nor did he know who did.
The prisoners having neither of them any witnesses to produce, Mr.
Justice Foster opened to the jury the substance of the indictment,
as before set forth, and told them that where several people joined
to do an act in itself unlawful, and death ensues from anything done
in prosecution of that unlawful design, they will be all considered
as principals in murder, if they were all present aiding or abetting
therein; that it was not necessary that each of the prisoners at the
bar should be guilty of every single abuse that was offered to the
deceased in the long series of barbarities the witnesses of the crown
had laid before them; if all or any of these abuses contributed to his
death, and the prisoners at the bar were engaged in the several designs
against him, and present aiding and abetting the others, they will be
guilty within this indictment.
He summed up the evidence very largely, and applied it to the case of
the prisoners; and then left it to the consideration of the gentlemen
of the jury.
The jury, after some little consideration together, gave their verdict,
that William Jackson and William Carter were both Guilty.
The counsel for the crown then moved for judgment; and all the seven
prisoners being set to the bar, and severally asked what they had to
say why judgment of death should not pass on them, Old Mills said he
had nothing to say, only that he knew nothing of the murder of Chater.
Young Mills said he was not at Scardefield’s a quarter of an hour; and
that it was by accident he called there, and that he knew nothing of
the murder.
Hammond and Cobby said they were compelled to stay by Richards and
Jackson, and that they would have made their escape, but could get no
opportunity to do so.
Tapner said he did not cut Chater across the face, neither could he
tell who did.
Jackson and Carter said that they had nothing more to say than what
they had already said,
And none of the prisoners or their counsel having anything to offer in
arrest of judgment, Mr. Justice Foster spoke to them as follows:--
“Benjamin Tapner, John Cobby, John Hammond, William Jackson, William
Carter, Richard Mills the elder, and Richard Mills the younger, you
have been convicted upon very full and satisfactory evidence of the
murder of Daniel Chater; three of you as principals, and the rest as
accessaries before the fact.
“And you, William Jackson and William Carter stand further convicted as
principals in the murder of William Galley.
“Deliberate murder is most justly ranked amongst the highest crimes
human nature is capable of; but those you have respectively been
convicted of, have been attended with circumstances of very high and
uncommon aggravation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account