Snakes: Curiosities and Wonders of Serpent LifeHopley, Catherine Cooper
Science
Snakes: Curiosities and Wonders of Serpent Life
Hopley, Catherine Cooper
Animal behavior; Snakes
It will be observed that the word _Trigonocephalus_ is used as a
generic name by some naturalists, and as a specific by others; and it
may with reason be applied to most of the American thanatophidia which
are not _elapidæ_. It therefore, at least, enables us to ascertain
that the snake of doubtful identity has this viperine characteristic
of the angular head; and as there is only one very small true viper at
present known in the New World, we may further decide that not being
an _Elaps_, our puzzler is a _Bothrops_ with the _doubles narines_,
and therefore equally meriting either of the descriptives _atropos_,
_atrox_, _furia_, _megæra_, _clotho_, _cophias_, and other such fearful
appellatives freely used to designate the deadly qualities of the worst
class of serpents. In reply to a communication of mine to _Land and
Water_, of 2d October 1880, Dr. Stradling[126] entered more fully into
this question of vernaculars, and what he says of Brazil we find to be
the case everywhere:—
‘Whatever meaning the colloquial titles have is generally grounded on
some popular error.’
This we saw in the case of _Xenodon_ and _Heterodon_, both called all
sorts of bad names on account of their supposed fangs.
‘In Brazil, _Jeboia_ and _Cascavel_ are the universal names for the
boa and rattlesnake; every snake with red in its markings is a coral
snake (“corral,” from the Spanish word for a ring), every one found
in or near the water would be a _Cobra de agua_, and every other is a
Jarraracca or a Curucucu.
‘I believe every country has a pet bugbear among serpents.
“Fer-de-lance” is the cry in St. Lucia when a snake rustles away in
the bush or inflicts a bite unseen, “Bushmaster” in Demerara, “Toboba”
in Nicaragua, “Vaia” in Mexico, “Vivera de la cruz” in the River
Plate. Over and over again have I had snakes of widely different
species sent to me, each guaranteed to be a genuine Jarraracca, until
I began to doubt whether the Jarraracca had any existence at all. I
believe that the one I sent to the Zoological Gardens the other day
is the real thing—_Craspedocephalus Brasiliensis_—at last’ (the
_Xenodon_ after all!) ‘and I think I have sifted the Curucucu down by
elimination till I can fix the term on _Trigonocephalus atrox_.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account