[Sidenote: The old and the newer methods of determining widths.]
=How Wide Ought a Street to be?=—Until very recent years in all American
cities, and even yet in some of them, the practice has been to lay out
streets in widths of forty, sixty, or eighty feet,—always using
multiples of ten. This is a mere rule-of-thumb method and bears no
direct relation to the needs of traffic. The downtown streets of the
older cities are, for the most part, too narrow; in the newer suburbs
they are often a good deal wider than they need be. “But what harm is
done by having more street space than is necessary?” it may be asked.
Well, every square foot of street space costs money; it has to be paved,
kept in repair, cleaned, and lighted. The proper policy in laying out
streets is to adapt their width to the probable needs of future traffic.
This cannot always be done with mathematical accuracy, because the
density of traffic changes from decade to decade; but with careful study
a fairly dependable estimate can usually be made.
[Sidenote: The traffic “zones”.]
The best practice nowadays is to fix the width of new streets in terms
of _traffic zones_, not merely in multiples of ten feet. A stream of
traffic—motor cars, trucks, and other vehicles following one
another—requires a certain sluiceway or zone to move in. This zone is
ordinarily reckoned as ten feet in width. A zone of parked vehicles
alongside the curb uses about eight feet. In order to allow full parking
privileges and still have space for two streams of traffic to flow along
easily (one in each direction) a street should be thirty-six feet in
width from curb to curb. Anything less than this usually means that
parking must be restricted or the thoroughfare must be made a one-way
street. Anything more than this is useless unless a full zone of ten
feet is added, and it is of relatively little value unless two
additional zones are put on.[83]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration:
For 4 lines of traffic
All moving
|—13’—|———40’———|—13’—|
|————--———66’—————————|
For 6 lines of traffic
4 moving & 2 standing
|—15’—|—————56’—-———|—15’—|
|———————————86’————-——————|
For 8 lines of traffic
6 moving & 2 standing
|—22’—|———————76’———————|—22’—|
|————————————120’—————————————|
]
The normal roadway width is based on an allowance of 10 feet for each
line of moving vehicles and 8 feet for each line of standing vehicles.
Where space is absolutely limited this unit allowance may be reduced to
9 feet for moving and 7 feet for standing vehicles.
The sidewalk width above suggested may be increased or reduced to meet
special requirements as to pedestrian traffic or special demands for a
tree and lawn strip.
TRAFFIC ZONES
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account