Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
To take but a single example: Everybody knows the story of Brummell
walking with Lord Alvanley in the Park being cut by the Prince Regent
and enquiring in an audible voice, “Who is your fat friend?” There
is very little point in the remark except its offensiveness. But the
biographer of Brummell, Captain Jesse, got the true version from a
friend who witnessed the incident. It was not in the Park, but at a
ball given by Brummell, Lord Alvanley, and two others. The Prince was
not invited, because of his quarrel with Brummell; but, as everybody
was going, he signified his pleasure to be present. When he arrived
he greeted Lord Alvanley and his other two hosts, cutting Brummell
pointedly, thereby insulting one of his entertainers. The Prince had by
a gross breach of good taste placed himself in an impossible position.
If he did not know his host, his host had a right to regard him as an
uninvited intruder; therefore the question was a snub, unanswerable
even by the Regent. The life of Brummell is the record of much folly
and frivolity, ending with a long exile in Calais, which terminated in
imbecility and death in an almshouse. Nevertheless this famous dandy,
fop though he was, is one of those butterflies whose useless lives
at least add to the beauty of the scene. Nor is it for the recorder
of his time to point the finger of scorn at him. Absurd as his ideal
was, it was not wholly contemptible. His vanity was not malicious,
he was at least no sycophant, he held his own among aristocrats, who
were as vulgar as they were arrogant. He shamed his associates into
decent manners, at a period when social polish was hardly skin deep.
He insisted on personal cleanliness in days when it was disregarded by
the highest in the land. He had the art of making friends who stood by
him in his hours of poverty and distress. The Duke of York, with all
his faults the best liked son of George III, the Duchess, one of the
most amiable ladies of the day, the Duke of Beaufort, and many others
remained staunch to him as long as he lived. He was a sharer in the
follies of his day, but so far as I know he was not so heartless in his
vices as many a greater man; nor did he pander to the vices of others.
We can laugh at his absurdities, without having that feeling of disgust
with which we regard many of the faults of his august rival, the Prince
Regent. How delightful, for example, is his criticism of the Duke of
Bedford’s coat! On one occasion his Grace asked the Beau his opinion of
his new clothes. “Turn round,” said Brummell, “now stand still.” Then
taking the garment by the lapel, he exclaimed, “Oh, Bedford, do you
call this a coat?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account