Social life in England, 1750-1850Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
History
Social life in England, 1750-1850
Foakes-Jackson, F. J. (Frederick John)
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
characters into a bygone age.
Of this he seems to have been conscious himself. When he drew pictures
to illustrate “Vanity Fair,” he did not depict Rawdon Crawley as a
Waterloo guardsman, nor Becky as a lady of fashion in 1816, nor Pitt as
an aristocratic member of the Clapham set. He drew them as the people
he knew himself and dressed them in the costume of his own time, thus
acknowledging how he really regarded his own creations.
The ruling aristocracy came to an end when the Reform Bill was passed
in 1832, but their prestige remained. The middle class entered
the Promised Land and took their share in its government: but not
triumphantly. I may almost say they were abashed by their success. The
peers could no more return a great proportion of the House of Commons,
they could no more promote or cast down common men much as they
pleased. They dare no longer defy public opinion as their predecessors
had done. Yet to the middle class they still appeared august enough.
Their manners, their breeding, the state in which many lived, inspired
no little awe among those immediately below them. Society was divided
into castes almost as rigidly, though less formally, than in India
to-day. The old Whig nobility still considered themselves divinely
called to rule the country and to dictate to the sovereign. The
county families held aloof from the inhabitants of the town; and
barely tolerated the professional classes. The beneficed clergy,
barristers, medical men, lesser army officers, etc., scorned the
traders. The wholesale trader held the retail storekeeper in scorn and
so on _ad infinitum_. But in England the barriers of rank were never
insurmountable, and in a free country anyone was at liberty to try to
climb them. Hence everybody endeavored with varying success to ascend
the social ladder, and did not scruple to use other people as stepping
stones. Thus arose the fierce fight to get into what is still called
“Society” and the rampant snobbery which Thackeray was never tired of
denouncing. With this we may begin the investigation of his attitude
towards the society of his age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account