We have to do with two processes, or two branches of a common process,
going on side by side, and each contributing in its way to the total
movement of organic life. In the case of the biological process or
branch the material vehicle of life is the germ-plasm, a special kind of
cells set apart for the transmission of hereditary types. In this there
is a complex mingling and development of tendencies in accordance with
laws of heredity which are as yet obscure. The social phase of the
process takes place through the medium of psychical communication, the
vehicle being language, in the widest sense of the word, including
writing, printing, and every means for the transmission of thought.
Through this, social types are propagated somewhat as biological types
are believed to be in the germ-plasm. In each of these mediums there is
a kind of growth, of selection, of adaptation of types to one another,
and of survival of some at the expense of others. It should be our aim
to see the two as organs of a common whole and to explain how they are
related to each other.
The best way to get this larger view, probably, is to consider the
evolution of the matter and note how heredity and environment, as we see
them working in man, have developed from lower forms of life. Among
animals and plants the actions that enable a living being to cope with
its surroundings and thus survive are secured mainly by heredity, and
come into the world ready-made, as it were, with little or no need to be
fashioned by a supplementary social process. Animal conduct, as broadly
contrasted with human, is a system of fixed hereditary responses to
fixed stimuli; the instinct is like a hand-organ which will play certain
tunes whenever you turn the crank, and will play no others no matter
what you do. If this predetermined reaction meets the needs of life, if
the tune is in harmony with events, the life of the organism is
furthered. But this can scarcely be unless the conditions of life have
been nearly uniform through many generations, so that the instinctive
mechanism has had time to become adjusted to them by a series of
survivals and eliminations, such as is required for “natural selection.”
If a newly hatched chick has come to have the instinct to pick up and
swallow small objects of a certain appearance, this implies that such
objects, for ages past, have on the whole proved to be digestible and
supported life; if they ceased to do so the race of chickens, I suppose,
would die out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account