The market (meaning by this the system of pecuniary transactions
regarded as one organic whole) is as much an institution as the state or
the church, which indeed it somewhat overshadows in modern life. I mean
that it is a vast and complicated social system, rooted in the past,
though grown enormously in recent times, wielding incalculable prestige,
and, though manned by individuals like other institutions, by no means
to be understood from a merely individual point of view. It would be as
reasonable to attempt to explain the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, or
the Institutes of Calvin, by the immediate working of religious instinct
as to explain the market values of the present time by the immediate
working of natural wants.
This is one of many points of view from which we may see the
insufficiency of the usual treatment of the value-making process in
treatises of political economy. This treatment starts with demand as a
_datum_, assuming that each individual has made up his mind what he
wants and how much he wants it. There is seldom, I believe, any serious
attempt to go back of this, it being assumed, apparently, that these
wants spring from the inscrutable depths of the private mind. At any
rate it has not been customary to recognize that they are the expression
of an institutional development. From most of the standard works the
student would get the impression that if institutions and classes exist
at all they have nothing to do with valuation.
The truth, I suppose, is that the idea of institutions, classes, and the
like as organic forms or processes, having a significance and power not
to be grasped from the standpoint of individuals or of general human
nature, is alien to the philosophy underlying orthodox economics, and
hence difficult of assimilation with orthodox theory. So far as such
ideas are recognized they are, I should say, rather patched on, than
woven into, the original stuff of the garment.[66] Economists, however,
are latterly becoming aware of the somewhat obsolete character of the
philosophy involved in the orthodox tradition.[67]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account