It has generally been considered sufficient to cover with water the bottom of the space in which absorption was to occur. The writer found that in order to insure uniform results, it was necessary to cover the entire inner surface of the vessel with wet blotting paper, and even then to exclude carefully all circulation of air by padding the joints with such paper. When only the bottom of the box was covered, samples placed at different levels above the water surface gave discordant results. It was also observed that whenever the thickness of the soil layer exceeded about one millimeter, a long time was required for full saturation; during which inevitable changes of temperature would bring about a deposition of dew on the soil, greatly exaggerating the absorptive coefficient. In the chamber used at the California station for soil saturation, dimensions 12 × 18 × 19 inches high, the same soil was exposed on a shelf close to the surface of the water, another midway up, a third near the lower surface of the cover; liquid water being in the bottom of the chamber, and the rest covered with wet blotters. It was found that despite these precautions, the lowest soil layer absorbed in the same time as much as ¾% more than the uppermost one. Some of the data so obtained are given in the table of physical soil composition on page 93, chapt. 6. They have since been extensively supplemented by additional determinations, but without materially changing the coefficients approximately corresponding to the several designations accepted in farm practice. Experiments conducted by the writer have conclusively shown that Knop’s law of decrease of absorption with rise of temperature not only is not true for _fully_ saturated air, but must be reversed; the fact being that the amount of water absorbed by the soil _increases in a fully saturated atmosphere_ (i.e., in presence of excess of water) _as the temperature rises_, at least between 15 and 35 degrees Cent. Thus, fine sandy soil which at 15° absorbed 2% of moisture, took up 4% at 34°; while loam soil absorbing 7% at 15°, showed nearly 9% at 35°; an increase of 2% in each case. But in partially saturated air[71] it was found that, as stated by Knop, the amounts absorbed steadily decrease, though not according to the law announced by him. Taking as a unit the moisture absorbed at 15°, it was found that in air three-fourths saturated, ¾ of the unit was taken up by the soil; at half saturation, nearly the proportional amount; but at one-fourth saturation the earths absorb materially more than a similar proportion, being then capable of withdrawing moisture from greatly undersaturated air. Since air thus undersaturated occurs not uncommonly in the arid regions of the world, the fact that the soil cannot be farther dried by such air of the same temperature, is of some practical significance.