Soils, their formation, properties, composition, and relations to climate and plant growth in the humid and arid regions — John Shaqi
Soils, their formation, properties, composition, and relations to climate and plant growth in the humid and arid regionsHilgard, Eugene W. (Eugene Woldemar)
Science
Soils, their formation, properties, composition, and relations to climate and plant growth in the humid and arid regions
Hilgard, Eugene W. (Eugene Woldemar)
Soils
_Moisture-requirements of Crops in the Arid Region._—Plants
(particularly broad-leaved ones) which have made a brash growth during
a period of abundant moisture, will wilt quickly when sunshine returns,
and take some time to adapt themselves to the drier conditions. On the
other hand, plants accustomed to dry air and scanty soil-moisture,
will not wilt or suffer under what would elsewhere be considered very
rigorous conditions. Loughridge[80] has made numerous determinations of
moisture in soils in which crops were beginning to suffer, and others
on similar soils that were growing normally, and found that in general,
not only were the differences in moisture content considerably less
than in the case above quoted from King’s observations, but that the
amounts of free moisture required by various crops in the arid climate
of California were surprisingly small.
[80] Rept. Cal. Expt. Sta. 1897-08, pp. 65-96.
The tables below show the results of observations made by Loughridge
during several drought years in California; so arranged as to show the
differences of moisture content for the same crop in different soils.
It will be observed that in all cases where a crop growing on a clay
soil could be compared with the same on a lighter soil, the moisture
required to keep the crop in good condition was very much greater
in the clay than in the loam or sandy soils. In the case of apples,
_e. g._, 8.3% of water was abundant to keep the trees in excellent
condition on a loam soil, while on a clay soil holding 12.3% the
condition was very poor. That this difference is due in the main to the
difference in the hygroscopic-moisture coefficient of the respective
soils, is plainly apparent in several cases. It is therefore not the
_total_ moisture content, but the free moisture present in excess of
what is held by hygroscopic absorption, that determines the welfare of
the plant.
By determining, first, the total moisture in the soils, as taken in
the field, then, after allowing them to become air-dry, determining
the maximum of hygroscopic moisture they would absorb (see p. 198),
Loughridge found by difference the amount of free moisture, or liquid
water which must be present in the soil to prevent the crops from
suffering. An exceptionally good opportunity for these observations
was offered by the dry season of 1898, during which crops suffering
and not suffering, on identical lands, could easily be found. The
determinations were always made for each foot of the upper four feet
of the land in the immediate neighborhood of the trees or among the
field crops. The first table exemplifies the method of procedure; the
second gives the summary of results for the several crops and trees, as
calculated from observations made during the season.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account