_Use of Drainage Waters for Irrigation._—When lands charged with alkali salts are being reclaimed by drainage, the question sometimes arises whether the drainage-water may not be used for irrigation, lower down. This of course depends entirely upon the amount of alkali in the water, the nature of the lands to be irrigated, and the manner of applying it. In the Fresno drainage-district of California it has been shown that some of the drainage-water contains not more than 25 to 30 grains per gallon of objectionable salts, and such waters could of course be used on pervious lands with the precautions above noted. _“Black Alkali” Waters._—As regards, however, waters containing any large proportion of carbonate of soda, it must be remembered that even very dilute solutions of salsoda serve to puddle the soil and thus render it difficultly tillable. When such waters are used it is necessary to forestall injury either by the use of gypsum in the reservoir or ditch, or by annually using on the land a sufficient amount of gypsum to transform the carbonate of soda into the relatively innocuous sulfate. _Variations in the Saline Contents of Irrigation Waters._—When irrigation waters are derived from deep wells, there is little if any variation of their saline contents to be expected, and a single analysis will serve permanently. But in the case of relatively shallow wells, from which the water must be raised by pumping, it not unfrequently happens that after a series of seasons of short rainfall, saline waters are brought up by the pump and may seriously injure crops and orchards. Again, in the case of streams and rivers whose flow becomes very small in summer, the saline content may increase to several times the amount carried at the time of high water. Both kinds of cases occur in southern California, in Arizona,[94] New Mexico and other states of the arid region. The Gila, Pecos and upper Rio Grande are cases in point, and to a certain extent the Colorado of the West. [94] Bull. Ariz. Exp’t Sta. No. 44. _Muddy Waters._—In the latter as well as other streams of Arizona, there is another point which sometimes creates difficulties to the irrigator, together with some current expense. It is the amount of silt or mud carried by the water, which while it is a benefit to the land over which it is spread, (“warping”) as in the classic case of the Nile, often clogs the irrigation ditches to such an extent as to cause considerable inconvenience and expense in cleaning them out. This is especially the case in the streams draining pasture lands that have been overstocked, and where the destruction of the natural herbage allows the rain water to run off rapidly, at first forming runlets and then gullies and ravines that originally were simply cow-paths leading toward the watering places.[95] The devastation of lands thus caused in Arizona is almost as great as that which has occurred in the Cotton states, as mentioned above chap. 12. p. 217.