Soils, their formation, properties, composition, and relations to climate and plant growth in the humid and arid regionsHilgard, Eugene W. (Eugene Woldemar)
Science
Soils, their formation, properties, composition, and relations to climate and plant growth in the humid and arid regions
Hilgard, Eugene W. (Eugene Woldemar)
Soils
The failure to appreciate this necessary difference often leads to
heavy losses on the part of newcomers to the arid region, who in this
as in other respects are apt to follow blindly the precepts familiar to
them in the East, until taught better by sore experience. In the East
and Middle West a depth of three inches is considered the proper one
for the protective surface-layer; and in the case of maize even this
is considered excessive in many cases. In the arid region this depth
should be at least doubled where irrigation is not practiced at least
every four to six weeks; and in some sandy soils even seven and eight
inches is not too much for effective protection.
_Illustrations of Effects of Surface Tillage._—The efficacy of loose
surface tilth in preventing evaporation, as compared with mere
superficial scratching or with the total omission of cultivation,
is well exemplified in a series of investigations conducted on this
subject during the extremely dry season of 1898, by the California
Experiment Station; the seasonal rainfall having during that year been
on an average from one-third to one-half only of the usual amount, so
as to test to the utmost the endurance of all growing plants. Some
of the details of this investigation have been given above (p. 214)
in connection with the question of moisture requirements of crops.
Loughridge[97] also investigated the moisture conditions in adjacent
orchards differently treated in cultivation. In one of these cases
two orchards of apricots were separated only by a lane, and the soil
identical; but one owner had omitted cultivation, while the other had
cultivated to an extra depth in view of the dry season apparently
impending. The results are best shown by the plates below, showing
representative trees and the annual growth made by each. The table
annexed shows the differences in the moisture-content of the two fields
to the depth of six feet, in July:
MOISTURE IN CULTIVATED AND UNCULTIVATED LAND.
===================+=====================+==================
| Cultivated. | Uncultivated.
Depth in soil. +------------+--------+---------+--------
| Per cent. |Tons per|Per cent.|Tons per
| | acre. | | acre.
-------------------+------------+--------+---------+--------
First foot | 6.4 | 128 | 4.3 | 86
Second foot | 5.8 | 116 | 4.4 | 88
Third foot | 6.4 | 128 | 3.9 | 78
Fourth foot | 6.5 | 130 | 5.1 | 100
Fifth foot | 6.7 | 134 | 3.4 | 68
Sixth foot | 6.0 | 120 | 4.5 | 90
| --- | --- | --- | ---
Total for six foot | 6.3 | 756 | 4.2 | 512
-------------------+------------+--------+---------+--------
[97] Rep. Calif. Expt. Sta. for 1897-98, p. 65.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account