American literature -- History and criticism; English literature -- History and criticism; World War, 1914-1918 -- Poetry
"This new object in life gives me huge pleasure. Of course, I knew
the catch quotations in Dante, but I never before attempted to read
him. The difficulty scared me."
Now, on the contrary, the difficulty was an attraction. He worked away
for hours at a time, braving the monotonies of the _Purgatorio_ without
flagging, but he broke down early in the _Paradiso_. He had no sympathy
whatever with what is mystic and spiritual, and he was extremely bored
by the Beatific Vision and the Rose of the Empyrean. I confess I took
advantage of this to recall his attention to _Veluvana_, for which it
was no longer possible to hope that the author would collect any
material out of Dante.
An invitation from Cambridge to lecture there on Russian history during
the Long Vacation of 1916 was a compliment to the value of the Russian
chapters of his _Memories_, but it was another distraction. It took his
thoughts away from _Veluvana_, although he protested to me that he
could prepare his Cambridge address, and yet continue to marshal his
fancies for the book. Perhaps I doubted it, and dared to disapprove, for
he wrote (March 17th, 1916):--
"You scold me for writing too much. That is the least of my
troubles! You must remember that debarred as I am from taking part
in society, the Three R's alone remain to me, and, indeed, of those
only two--for owing to my having enjoyed an Eton education in days
when arithmetic was deemed to be no part of the intellectual
panoply of a gentleman, I can neither add, subtract, nor divide! I
am a gluttonous reader, and only write from time to time."
He was really composing more actively than he himself realised. About
this time he wrote:--
"Just now I am busy trying to whitewash Lord Hertford--not the
Marquess of Steyne, that would be impossible--but the unhappy
hypochondriac recluse of the Rue Lafitte, who I believe has been
most malignantly traduced by the third-rate English Colony in
Paris--all his faults exaggerated, none of his good qualities even
hinted at. The good British public has so long been used to look
upon him as a minotaur that it will perhaps startle and amuse it to
be told that he had many admirable points."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account