Some Problems of the Peace ConferenceHaskins, Charles Homer
History
Some Problems of the Peace Conference
Haskins, Charles Homer
Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920); World War, 1914-1918 -- Territorial questions
To one who approaches the matter without any nationalistic
prepossessions the fate of the Rhine valley seems to have been
determined, not by any geographic necessity, but by the vicissitudes of
history. France has no such clearly marked frontier on the northeast
as it possesses in other directions, for the Rhine, like other rivers,
unites more than it divides, while a mountain range like the Vosges,
strongly recommended by German writers in the region of Alsace, fails
as we proceed northward. As a matter of history, whatever value the
Rhine frontier possessed in Roman days disappeared with the Germanic
invasions, and ever since the partitions of the Frankish empire in
the ninth century the lands between the Rhine and the Meuse have been
debated between France and Germany. There is no racial frontier,
for the region is one of mixed Teutonic and Alpine types, whose
distribution was more affected by highland and valley than by any
considerations of east and west. There is a linguistic frontier, which
has scarcely changed in the open country since the early Middle Ages,
and French and German speech have naturally been the vehicles of
their respective civilizations; but the linguistic and the political
frontiers have rarely coincided, and “the linguistic frontier has never
determined the political.”[31] The decisive considerations have been
political pressure and military force, and in the more recent period
political affinities and economic relations.
At first Germany had the advantage, if we mean by Germany that loose
congeries of tribal duchies and later of feudal principalities which
made up the mediaeval Empire. Thus the partition of Meersen (870),
which you will seek in vain in the text of Freeman’s _Geography_ or in
Schrader’s _Atlas historique_, is often cited by German scholars as
fixing a permanent line of demarcation to Germany’s advantage, and was
even invoked by Brockdorff-Rantzau in May 1919 as the original basis
of the German title to the Saar valley. Yet this same line would give
to France Maestricht, Liège, and the mouths of the Rhine! After the
disintegration of the Empire in the later Middle Ages, French advance
began actively in the sixteenth century in the region of the Three
Bishoprics. In the seventeenth century Louis XIV intrenched himself on
the Saar at Saarlouis, and piece by piece gained possession of Alsace.
The Revolution carried the tricolor down the Rhine from Landau to the
Dutch border. Then came the treaty of Vienna, setting France back to
the limits of 1789 and even farther, and the treaty of Frankfort by
which France lost all contact with the Rhine. The victory of 1918 again
put France on the Rhine. A German medal of 1917 represents an exhausted
France driven to her death by England at Verdun, while on the obverse
under the insignia of peace the German Rhine flows calmly on--“und
ruhig fliesst der Rhein.” The French flag now floats not only over
Verdun but over Metz and Strasburg as well. The Rhine still flows on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account