Some Recollections of Our Antislavery ConflictMay, Samuel J. (Samuel Joseph)
History
Some Recollections of Our Antislavery Conflict
May, Samuel J. (Samuel Joseph)
Antislavery movements -- United States
In 1847 Mr. May was appointed _General Agent of the Massachusetts
Antislavery Society_, and continued in that responsible and laborious
office until after the abolition of slavery in 1865. He was instant
in season and out of season, and in co-operation with his devoted
assistant, Rev. R. F. Wallcut, rendered services the amount and value
of which cannot easily be estimated.
THE FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW.
The awful iniquity of our nation culminated in the enactment of the
_Fugitive Slave Law_, which, as Edmund Quincy said at the time,
stood, as it now stands, “a piece of diabolical ingenuity, for the
accomplishment of a devilish purpose, _without a rival_ among all the
tyrannical enactments or edicts of servile parliaments or despotic
monarchs.” It was the essential article of a political conglomerate,
prepared by the Arch Compromiser, Henry Clay, which was called the
Omnibus Bill; some parts of which, he vainly thought, would conciliate
the Northern States to the reception of the whole. It provided for
the admission of California into our Union, with an antislavery
Constitution; for the organization of two other Territories without
the prohibition of slavery; the extension of the southwestern boundary
of Texas to the Rio Grande; the abolition of the slave-trade in the
District of Columbia, with the guaranty of slavery to its inhabitants
until they should see fit to abolish it; and the perpetuity of the
interstate slave-trade; but infinitely worse than any of these
objectionable parts were the stringent measures it proposed for the
recovery of fugitives from slavery. Stripped of the verbiage of legal
enactments, the provisions of this abominable law were as follows:--
1. The claimant of any person who had escaped, or should escape
from slavery in any State or Territory, might apply to any Court
of Record or Judge thereof, describe the fugitive and make
satisfactory proof that he or she owed service or labor to said
claimant. Thereupon the Court, or in vacation the Judge, was
required to cause a record to be made of the description of the
alleged fugitive, and of the proof of his or her enslavement, and
give an attested copy of that record to the claimant; which copy
was required to be received by any court, judge, or commissioner in
any other State or Territory of the Union, as full and conclusive
evidence that the person claimed, and so described, was a fugitive
from slavery and owed service to the claimant, and therefore should
be delivered up.
Any marshal or deputy who should refuse to arrest such a fugitive
was to be fined _one thousand dollars_. And if, after having
arrested him or her, the fugitive should in any way escape from his
custody, the marshal or deputy should be held liable to pay to the
claimant the value of the runaway.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account