Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.Astell, Mary
Philosophy
Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.
Astell, Mary
Marriage; Women -- Social conditions
Far be it from her to stir up Sedition of any sort: none can abhor it
more; and she heartily wishes, that our Masters would pay their Civil
and Ecclesiastical Governors the same Submission, which they themselves
exact from their Domestick Subjects. Nor can she imagine how she any way
undermines the Masculine Empire, or blows the Trumpet of Rebellion to
the Moiety of Mankind. Is it by exhorting Women, not to expect to have
their own Will in any thing, but to be intirely Submissive, when once
they have made Choice of a Lord and Master, though he happen not to be
so wise, so kind, or even so just a Governor as was expected? She did
not, indeed, advise them to think his Folly Wisdom, nor his Brutality,
that Love and Worship he promised in his Matrimonial Oath; for this
required a Flight of Wit and Sense much above her poor Ability, and
proper only to Masculine Understandings. However, she did not in any
manner prompt them to Resist, or to Abdicate the Perjur’d Spouse, though
the Laws of _GOD_, and the Land, make Special Provision for it, in a
Case, wherein, as is to be fear’d, few Men can truly plead Not Guilty.
’Tis true, through want of Learning, and of that Superior Genius which
Men, as Men, lay claim to, she was ignorant of the _Natural Inferiority_
of our Sex, which our Masters lay down as a Self-evident and Fundamental
Truth. She saw nothing in the Reason of Things, to make this either a
Principle or a Conclusion, but much to the contrary; it being Sedition
at least, if not Treason, to assert it in this Reign. For if by the
Natural Superiority of their Sex, they mean, that _every_ Man is by
Nature superior to _every_ Woman, which is the obvious Meaning, and that
which must be stuck to if they would speak Sense, it would be a Sin in
_any_ Woman, to have Dominion over _any_ Man, and the greatest Queen
ought not to command, but to obey, her Footman: because no Municipal
Laws can supersede or change the Law of Nature: So that if the Dominion
of the Men be such, the _Salique Law_, as unjust as _English Men_ have
ever thought it, ought to take Place over all the Earth, and the most
glorious Reigns in the _English_, _Danish_, _Castilian_, and other
Annals, were wicked Violations of the Law of Nature!
If they mean that _some_ Men are superior to _some_ Women, this is no
great Discovery; had they turn’d the Tables, they might have seen that
_some_ Women are superior to _some_ Men. Or had they been pleased to
remember their Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy, they might have known,
that _One_ Woman is superior to _All_ the Men in these Nations, or else
they have sworn to very little Purpose. And it must not be suppos’d,
that their Reason and Religion would suffer them to take Oaths, contrary
to the Law of Nature and Reason of Things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account