Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.Astell, Mary
Philosophy
Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.
Astell, Mary
Marriage; Women -- Social conditions
By all which it appears, that our Reflector’s Ignorance is very
pitiable; it may be her Misfortune, but not her Crime, especially since
she is willing to be better inform’d, and hopes she shall never be so
obstinate as to shut her Eyes against the Light of Truth, which is not
to be charg’d with Novelty, how late soever we may be bless’d with the
Discovery. Nor can Error, be it as antient as it may, ever plead
Prescription against Truth. And since the only way to remove all Doubts,
to answer all Objections, and to give the Mind entire Satisfaction, is
not by _Affirming_, but by _Proving_, so that every one may see with
their _own_ Eyes, and judge according to the best of their _own_
Understandings; she hopes it is no Presumption to insist on this Natural
Right of Judging for her self, and the rather, because by quitting it,
we give up all the Means of Rational Conviction. Allow us then as many
Glasses as you please to help our Sight, and as many good Arguments as
you can afford to convince our Understandings: But don’t exact of us, we
beseech you, to affirm that we see such Things as are only the Discovery
of Men who have quicker Senses; or, that we understand, and know what we
have by Hear-say only; for to be so excessively Complaisant, is neither
to see nor to understand.
That the Custom of the World, has put Women, generally speaking, into a
State of Subjection, is not denied; but the Right can no more be prov’d
from the Fact, than the Predominancy of Vice can justify it. A certain
great Man, has endeavour’d to prove, by Reasons not contemptible, that
in the Original State of Things the Woman was the Superior, and that her
Subjection to the Man is an Effect of the Fall, and the Punishment of
her Sin: And, that ingenious Theorist Mr. _Whiston_, asserts, That
before the Fall there was a greater Equality between the two Sexes.
However this be, ’tis certainly no Arrogance in a Woman to conclude,
that she was made for the Service of _GOD_, and that this is her End.
Because _GOD_ made all Things for Himself, and a rational Mind is too
noble a Being to be made for the Sake and Service of any Creature. The
Service she at any Time becomes oblig’d to pay to a Man, is only a
Business by the Bye, just as it may be any Man’s Business and Duty to
keep Hogs; he was not Made for this, but if he Hires himself out to such
an Employment, he ought conscientiously to perform it. Nor can any thing
be concluded to the contrary from St. _Paul_’s Argument, 1 _Cor._ xi.
for he argues only for Decency and Order, according to the present
Custom and State of Things: Taking his Words strictly and literally,
they prove too much, in that, _Praying and Prophecying in the Church_
are allow’d the Women, provided they do it with their Head cover’d as
well as the Men; and no Inequality can be inferr’d from hence, neither
from the Gradation the Apostle there uses, that _the Head of every Man
is Christ, and that the Head of the Woman is the Man, and the Head of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account