Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.Astell, Mary
Philosophy
Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.
Astell, Mary
Marriage; Women -- Social conditions
between the two Sexes is mutual, and the Dependance reciprocal, both of
them depending intirely upon _GOD_, and upon Him only; which, one would
think, is no great Argument of the natural Inferiority of either Sex.
Our _Reflector_ is of Opinion, that Disputes of this kind, extending to
Human Nature in general, and not peculiar to those to whom the Word of
_GOD_ has been reveal’d, ought to be decided by Natural Reason only.
And, that the Holy Scripture should not be interested in the present
Controversy, in which it determines nothing, any more than it does
between the _Copernican_ and _Ptolomean_ Systems. The Design of those
Holy Books being to make us excellent Moralists and perfect Christians,
not great Philosophers; and being writ for the Vulgar as well as for the
Learned, they are accommodated to the common way of Speech and the Usage
of the World; in which we have but a short Probation, so that it matters
not much what Part we act, whether of Governing or Obeying, provided we
perform it well with respect to the World to come.
One does not wonder, indeed, that when an Adversary is drove to a
Nonplus, and Reason declares against him, he flies to Authority,
especially to Divine, which is infallible, and therefore ought not to be
disputed. But Scripture is not always on their Side who make Parade of
it, and through their Skill in Languages, and the Tricks of the Schools,
wrest it from its genuine Sense to their own Inventions. And supposing,
not granting, that it were apparently to the Womens Disadvantage, no
fair and generous Adversary but would be asham’d to urge this Advantage:
Because Women, without their own Fault, are kept in Ignorance of the
Original, wanting Languages and other Helps to Criticise on the Sacred
Text, of which, they know no more, than Men are pleas’d to impart in
their Translations. In short, they shew their Desire to maintain their
Hypotheses, but by no means their Reverence to the Sacred Oracles, who
engage them in such Disputes. And therefore, the Blame be theirs, who
have unnecessarily introduc’d them in the present Subject, and who, by
saying, that the _Reflections_ were not agreeable to Scripture, oblige
the Reflector to shew, that those who affirm it must either mistake her
Meaning, or the Sense of Holy Scripture, or both, if they think what
they say, and do not find fault meerly because they resolve to do so.
For, had she ever writ any thing contrary to those sacred Truths, she
would be the first in pronouncing its Condemnation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account