Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.Astell, Mary
Philosophy
Some Reflections Upon Marriage.: With additions.
Astell, Mary
Marriage; Women -- Social conditions
But what says the Holy Scripture? It speaks of Women as in a State of
Subjection, and so it does of the _Jews_ and _Christians_, when under
the Dominion of the _Chaldeans_ and _Romans_, requiring of the one as
well as of the other, a quiet Submission to them under whose Power they
liv’d. But will any one say, that these had a _Natural Superiority_ and
Right to Dominion? that they had a superior Understanding, or any
Pre-eminence, except what their greater Strength acquir’d? Or, that the
other were subjected to their Adversaries for any other Reason but the
Punishment of their Sins, and, in order to their Reformation? Or for the
Exercise of their Vertue, and because the Order of the World and the
Good of Society requir’d it?
If Mankind had never Sin’d, Reason would always have been obeyed, there
would have been no Struggle for Dominion, and Brutal Power would not
have prevail’d. But in the lapsed State of Mankind, and now, that Men
will not be guided by their Reason but by their Appetites, and do not
what they _ought_ but what they _can_, the Reason, or that which stands
for it, the Will and Pleasure of the Governor, is to be the Reason of
those who will not be guided by their own, and must take Place for
Order’s sake, although it should not be conformable to right Reason. Nor
can there be any Society great or little, from Empires down to private
Families, without a last Resort, to determine the Affairs of that
Society by an irresistable Sentence. Now unless this Supremacy be fix’d
somewhere, there will be a perpetual Contention about it, such is the
Love of Dominion, and let the Reason of Things be what it may, those who
have least Force or Cunning to supply it, will have the Disadvantage. So
that since Women are acknowledged to have least Bodily Strength, their
being commanded to Obey is in pure Kindness to them, and for their Quiet
and Security, as well as for the Exercise of their Vertue. But does it
follow, that Domestick Governors have more Sense than their Subjects,
any more than that other Governors have? We do not find that any Man
thinks the worse of his own Understanding, because another has superior
Power; or concludes himself less capable of a Post of Honour and
Authority, because he is not prefer’d to it. How much Time would lie on
Mens Hands, how empty would the Places of Concourse be, and how silent
most Companies, did Men forbear to censure their Governors, that is, in
effect, to think themselves wiser. Indeed, Government would be much more
desirable than it is, did it invest the Possessor with a superior
Understanding as well as Power. And if meer Power gives a Right to Rule,
there can be no such Thing as Usurpation; but a Highway-Man, so long as
he has Strength to force, has also a Right to require our Obedience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account