--What! you diminish the receipts, without lessening expenses, and you
avoid a deficit?
--Yes, by diminishing other taxes at the same time.
(Here the interlocutor, putting the index finger of his right hand on
his forehead, shook his head, which may be translated thus: He is
rambling terribly.)
--Well, upon my word, this is ingenious. I pay the Treasury a hundred
francs; you relieve me of five francs on salt, five on postage; and in
order that the Treasury may nevertheless receive one hundred francs, you
relieve me of ten on some other tax?
--Precisely; you understand me.
--How can it be true? I am not even sure that I have heard you.
--I repeat that I balance one remission of taxes by another.
--I have a little time to give, and I should like to hear you expound
this paradox.
--Here is the whole mystery: I know a tax which costs you twenty francs,
not a sou of which gets to the Treasury. I relieve you of half of it,
and make the other half take its proper destination.
--You are an unequaled financier. There is but one difficulty. What tax,
if you please, do I pay, which does not go to the Treasury?
--How much does this suit of clothes cost you?
--A hundred francs.
--How much would it have cost you if you had gotten the cloth from
Belgium?
--Eighty francs.
--Then why did you not get it there?
--Because it is prohibited.
--Why?
--So that the suit may cost me one hundred francs instead of eighty.
--This denial, then, costs you twenty francs?
--Undoubtedly.
--And where do these twenty francs go?
--Where do they go? To the manufacturer of the cloth.
--Well, give me ten francs for the Treasury, and I will remove the
restriction, and you will gain ten francs.
--Oh, I begin to see. The treasury account shows that it loses five
francs on postage and five on salt, and gains ten on cloth. That is
even.
--Your account is--you gain five francs on salt, five on postage, and
ten on cloth.
--Total, twenty francs. This is satisfactory enough. But what becomes of
the poor cloth manufacturer?
--Oh, I have thought of him. I have secured compensation for him by
means of the tax reductions which are so profitable to the Treasury.
What I have done for you as regards cloth, I do for him in regard to
wool, coal, machinery, etc., so that he can lower his price without
loss.
--But are you sure that will be an equivalent?
--The balance will be in his favor. The twenty francs that you gain on
the cloth will be multiplied by those which I will save for you on
grain, meat, fuel, etc. This will amount to a large sum, and each one of
your 35,000,000 fellow-citizens will save the same way. There will be
enough to consume the cloths of both Belgium and France. The nation will
be better clothed; that is all.
--I will think on this, for it is somewhat confused in my head.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account