You have remarked the almost total absence of sound on the part of a vibrating tuning-fork when held free in the hand. The feebleness of the fork as a sounding body arises in part from interference. The prongs always vibrate in opposite directions, one producing a condensation where the other produces a rarefaction, a destruction of sound being the consequence. By simply passing a pasteboard tube over one of the prongs of the fork, its vibrations are in part intercepted, and an augmentation of the sound is the result. The single prong is thus proved to be more effectual than the two prongs. There are positions in which the destruction of the sound of one prong by that of the other is _total_. These positions are easily found by striking the fork and turning it round before the ear. When the back of the prong is parallel to the ear, the sound is heard; when the side surfaces of both prongs are parallel to the ear, the sound is also heard; but when the _corner_ of a prong is carefully presented to the ear, the sound is utterly destroyed. During one complete rotation of the fork we find four positions where the sound is thus obliterated. [Illustration: FIG. 160.] Let _s s_ (Fig. 160) represent the two ends of the tuning-fork, looked down upon as it stands upright. When the ear is placed at _a_ or _b_, or at _c_ or _d_, the sound is heard. Along the four dotted lines, on the contrary, the waves generated by the two prongs completely neutralize each other, and nothing is there heard. These lines have been proved by Weber to be hyperbolic curves; and this must be their character according to the principle of interference. This remarkable case of interference, which was first noticed by Dr. Thomas Young, and thoroughly investigated by the brothers Weber, may be rendered audible by means of resonance. Bringing a vibrating fork over a jar which resounds to it, and causing the fork to rotate slowly, in four positions we have a loud resonance; in four others absolute silence, alternate risings and fallings of the sound accompanying the fork’s rotation. While the fork is over the jar with its corner downward and the sound entirely extinguished, let a pasteboard tube be passed over one of its prongs, as in Fig. 161, a loud resonance announces the withdrawal of the vibrations of that prong. To obtain this effect, the fork must be held over the centre of the jar, so that the air shall be symmetrically distributed on both sides of it. Moving the fork from the centre toward one of the sides, without altering its inclination in the least, we obtain a forcible sound. Interference, however, is also possible near the side of the jar. Holding the fork, not with its corner downward, but with both its prongs in the same horizontal plane, a position is soon found near the side of the jar where the sound is extinguished. In passing completely from side to side over the mouth of the jar, two such places of interference are discoverable. [Illustration: FIG. 161.]