Source Book of London History, from the earliest times to 1800
History
Source Book of London History, from the earliest times to 1800
London (England) -- History
As it had these, and many other, advantages and helps to be rich, so
it was looked upon too much of late time as a common stock not easy
to be exhausted, and as a body not to be grieved by ordinary acts of
injustice; and therefore it was not only a resort in all cases of
necessity for the sudden borrowing great sums of money, (in which
they were commonly too good merchants for the Crown,) but it was
thought reasonable upon any specious pretences to avoid the security
that was at any time given for money so borrowed.
So, after many questions of their charter, (which were ever removed
by considerable sums of money,) a grant made by the King in the
beginning of his reign, in consideration of great sums of money, of
good quantities of land in Ireland, and the city of Londonderry
there, was avoided by a suit in the Star-Chamber, all the lands
(after a vast expense in building and planting,) resumed into the
King's hands, and a fine of £50,000 imposed upon the city. Which
sentence being pronounced after a long and public hearing, during
which time they were often invited to a composition, both in respect
of the substance and the circumstances of proceeding, made a general
impression in the minds of the citizens of all conditions much to
the disadvantage of the Court; and though the King afterwards
remitted to them the benefit of that sentence, they imputed that to
the power of the Parliament, and rather remembered how it had been
taken from them than by whom it was restored: so that at the
beginning of the Parliament the city was as ill affected to the
Court as the country was, and therefore chose such burgesses to sit
there as had either eminently opposed it or accidentally been
oppressed by it.
A PROCLAMATION AGAINST THE CITY (1643).
On the outbreak of civil war it soon became clear that many of the
trading centres of the country, including London, would take up arms
against the King. The commercial interests of the country had been so
persistently assailed, royal interference in matters of trade had been
so marked, that this situation was not at all surprising. It is hardly
necessary to point out that the King, in the preamble to this
proclamation, shows either insincerity or ignorance. The citizens of
London and of the other towns had no particularly strong object in their
resistance beyond obtaining reasonable security for their interests, and
the attempt to isolate London from intercourse with the rest of the
country was as ill-advised as it was futile.
=Source.=—Rushworth's _Collections_, part iii., vol. ii., p. 365.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account