72 | xiv, 31-33|King going to war |QLk *73 | xiv, 34-35|Salt is good. If the salt has lost |(Mk) QLk *73a| xvi, 13 |About serving two masters |Q *74 | xvi, 16 |The law and prophets until John |Q *75 | xvi, 17 |Relation to the law |QLk *76 | xvi, 18 |Divorce |Q (Mk) *77 | xvii, 1-2 |Offenses |Q (Mk) *78 | xvii, 3-4 |On forgiveness |QLk *79 | xvii, 5-6 |Faith as a grain of mustard seed |QLk 80 | xvii, 20-21|The kingdom cometh not with observation |QLk *81 | xvii, 22-25|The day of the Son of man |QLk *82 | xvii, 26-27|The days of Noah |QLk 83 | xvii, 28-32|The days of Lot |QLk *84 | xvii, 33 |Saving and losing one's soul |Q *85 | xvii, 34-35|Two in one bed (field) |QLk *86 | xvii, 37 |Where the body is, there the eagles, etc. |Q 87 |xviii, 1-8 |The parable of the Unjust Judge |QLk 88 | xxi, 34-35|The necessity for watchfulness and prayer |QLk 89 | xxii, 30 |Eating and drinking in the kingdom of God; | | | twelve thrones |QLk ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * The asterisk indicates Q material in Luke duplicated in Matthew. As to the generally homogeneous character of the sections marked Q, there will be no dispute. Since these are restricted to the passages showing the very closest parallelism, there can be no question about the propriety of assigning them to Q. The only question will be as to the assignment of any unduplicated material to any form of Q, and the assignment of the duplicated but not closely paralleled sections to QMt and QLk instead of simply to Q. Reasons have been given[127] for such assignments in each case. But a few sections may be taken as again illustrating the advantages of the QMt-QLk hypothesis. PASSAGES CLOSELY SIMILAR, YET WITH DIVERGENCES TOO GREAT TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR UPON THE HYPOTHESIS OF AN UNDIFFERENTIATED Q