[71] In the _Hibbert Journal_, No. 39, April, 1912, pp. 615-25. [72] This passage has been already treated in a different connection on p. 39. [73] Omitted in some manuscripts of Mark. [74] vii, 28; xi, 1; xiii, 53; xix, 1; xxvi, 1. [75] Hawkins, _Horae Synopticae_, p. 165. [76] Wernle, p. 110. [77] Luke uses it twenty-four times against Matthew's seven and Mark's four. [78] P. 617. [79] Mk xiv, 54. [80] In xiv, 66. [81] P. 617. [82] Lk xxii, 54. [83] See his note, p. 618. [84] P. 621. This judgment upon Luke is in striking contrast to that expressed by Müller, _Zur Synopse_, p. 3: "Wellhausen calls Luke a "historian." This judgment rests on excellent grounds. We see this at once in the manner in which Luke has used the text-scaffolding of Mark. Logical, simple, and transparent considerations have moved him," etc. Müller's judgment is decidedly the better. [85] P. 625. [86] In his _Gospel History and Its Transmission_, and _Earliest Sources for the Life of Jesus_. [87] E.g., Stanton: see his _Gospels as Historical Documents_, Part II; and Robinson: see his _Study of the Gospels_. [88] Cf. especially the prediction of sufferings connected with the confession of Peter (Mt xvi, 13-23); the speech about Elijah, connected with the transfiguration (Mt xvii, 9-13); the speech about true greatness, connected with the request of the sons of Zebedee (Mt xx, 20-28). [89] _Oxford Studies_, p. xxii. [90] Hawkins' list comes from his _Horae Synopticae_. In his essay in _Oxford Studies_ he assigns a considerably larger content to Q. [91] _Einleitung_, pp. 16-18. [92] Effort will be made later to determine the extent of QMt and QLk by themselves. [93] The writer began the following examination with the intention of assigning to Q only, and rejecting all passages not showing sufficient agreement to warrant such assignment. He found this task so difficult, involving the rejection of so many passages which did not apparently belong to Q but which nevertheless showed unmistakable signs of literary relation, that he adopted the theory (suggested but not worked out in the introduction to Bacon's _Beginnings of Gospel Story_) of QMt and QLk. [94] See Wellhausen's _Einleitung_, p. 36, and pp. 124-25 of this book. [95] _Das älteste Evangelium_, p. 175. [96] _Encyclopaedia Biblica_, col. 1864. [97] See also pp. 124-25. [98] See the treatment of this passage on p. 124. [99] See his _Sayings of Jesus_, pp. 30-31. [100] _Oxford Studies in the Synoptic Problem_, p. 109. [101] _Sayings of Jesus_, p. 52. [102] _Oxford Studies_, p. 133. [103] _Encyclopedia Biblica_, Vol. II, col. 1864. [104] P. 78. [105] Κρυφαίῳ is in vs. 18 substituted for κρυπτῷ used in 4 and 6. [106] _Oxford Studies in the Synoptic Problem_, p. 149. [107] Pp. 40-42. [108] _Schriften des Neuen Testaments_, I, 324. [109] _The Synoptic Gospels_, I, 608. [110] Quoted by Montefiore, I, 610.